Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: Would you like to be informed in a regular and effective way on the patch progress?
Yes, please. 213 85.89%
No, thank you. 27 10.89%
I'm not sure. 8 3.23%
Voters: 248. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-26-2011, 01:03 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II View Post
Of course it matters, everyone's opinion does.
That's not even close to being true. The only opinions which matter are those of the people on the dev team.
  #22  
Old 07-26-2011, 01:06 PM
Sternjaeger II Sternjaeger II is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert View Post
I don't see an option in the poll for me. If I'm right and these current issues from the June 3rd update are fundamental, then I don't see another update coming until closer to beta release. I'm perfectly fine with that, given future updates would progress at the speed needed of future repairs/fixes et al.

So to me these updates ARE timely and I'm getting enough information so I already am getting my fill of development updates and feel I'm informed enough. I'm not sure I see an option for that.
Robert, I understand your point, my question though is whether you like or not to be informed in a regular and effective way , nothing more, nothing less.

I'm trying to do a step by step assessing of the situation here, as you can see there are at least 5 people that don't want to be updated regularly.
  #23  
Old 07-26-2011, 01:09 PM
Sternjaeger II Sternjaeger II is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
That's not even close to being true. The only opinions which matter are those of the people on the dev team.
thanks for your opinion on the matter. Why don't you try and post a poll with such a statement and see where that one goes
  #24  
Old 07-26-2011, 01:11 PM
ATAG_Dutch ATAG_Dutch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II View Post
thanks for your opinion on the matter.
  #25  
Old 07-26-2011, 01:12 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II View Post
thanks for your opinion on the matter. Why don't you try and post a poll with such a statement and see where that one goes
What difference would another poll make?
  #26  
Old 07-26-2011, 01:15 PM
Robert's Avatar
Robert Robert is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 717
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II View Post
Robert, I understand your point, my question though is whether you like or not to be informed in a regular and effective way , nothing more, nothing less.

I'm trying to do a step by step assessing of the situation here, as you can see there are at least 5 people that don't want to be updated regularly.

So then I'd obviously vote yes, because I WANT updates in a regular manner. I'm just not sure if updates can be done on a regular basis when the road map is so fluid ATM. One man's regular interval. may be anothers desert of information.


Being that I'm satisfied with the updates for now, and knowing many aren't, I don't think that's how the poll would be perceived. I think many will use it as a 'war cry' to muster up support and try to strong arm information or updates, when for me the regularity (or lack thereof) is fine with me.

I want updates. I'm fine with the way they are coming out. I don't think that's how the poll reads.



Say you get 100 yeahs.... 5 nays.... and 1 maybe. That says 100 want information. Fine. We all do. But it doesn't say that out of 100 there may be 50 who are satisfied with update progress. It CAN be construed to mean that 100 people want regular updates and all 100 think you're not doing a good job of it. That's why I abstained.

Last edited by Robert; 07-26-2011 at 01:21 PM.
  #27  
Old 07-26-2011, 01:20 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
What difference would another poll make?
Well, it would display how the rest of the community feels about your opinion.
  #28  
Old 07-26-2011, 01:26 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
Well, it would display how the rest of the community feels about your opinion.
Do you think that would change anything?
  #29  
Old 07-26-2011, 01:29 PM
catito14 catito14 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 119
Default

We are trying to understand the "Russian idiosyncrasy" with our "west idiosyncrasy", apparently in Russia, they do not develop the informational aspect to their customers, preferring to use those energies in other areas. So I THINK, that we even publish hundreds of polls and publish hundreds of posts claiming for more information or contact with us, they will not listen to us, simply because it is their way of thinking and working
  #30  
Old 07-26-2011, 01:42 PM
Sternjaeger II Sternjaeger II is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert View Post
So then I'd obviously vote yes, because I WANT updates in a regular manner. I'm just not sure if updates can be done on a regular basis when the road map is so fluid ATM. One man's regular interval. may be anothers desert of information.


Being that I'm satisfied with the updates for now, and knowing many aren't, I don't think that's how the poll would be perceived. I think many will use it as a 'war cry' to muster up support and try to strong arm information or updates, when for me the regularity (or lack thereof) is fine with me.

I want updates. I'm fine with the way they are coming out. I don't think that's how the poll reads.



Say you get 100 yeahs.... 5 nays.... and 1 maybe. That says 100 want information. Fine. We all do. But it doesn't say that out of 100 there may be 50 who are satisfied with update progress. It CAN be construed to mean that 100 people want regular updates and all 100 think you're not doing a good job of it. That's why I abstained.
it has been fairly balanced so far, apart for some agitators. I would like to stress on the fact that this is not a protest or a war cry, it's just... a poll?

You already expressed your opinion by non voting, which is a valid option, I would have selected "I'm not sure", but then again I do understand your concerns. All I'm trying to do here again is trying to see how much it really matters to the community to be regularly updated on what's going on, according to some our opinion doesn't even matter, go figure!
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.