|
Performance threads All discussions about CoD performnce |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
One of the best places to lurk and learn about overclocking is at www.overclock.net.
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
so true, Urufu
I last visited the site in July of last year. I'd forgotten about it! A great resource for sure.
Flyby out
__________________
the warrior creed: crap happens to the other guy! |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Well I used to "overcook"
Even with manufactures now engineering their hardware to perform at “overcooked” specs, they still won’t provide a warrantee if you do over clock them. Plus, I personally hate the smell of burning plastic in the house and the sight of smoke coming from by PC. I won’t do that again … LOL I now religiously pay for the best performance rather than try and make a lower spec’d component perform at a higher specs. |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
I overclocked my quad core from 2.66 to 3.2 GHz and fps in FSX was boosted by the same proportions.
If the graphics card is the bottleneck, like in most non-sim games, it will not happen until you change the card. Know your bottlenecks...
__________________
EVGA X58 FTW3 motherboard Intel 980X CPU, not OC'd yet, 3.46 Mhz Crucial Tracer memory 8-8-8-24 12GB Crucial M4 256GB SSD, WD Raptor 600 GB hard disk EVGA GTX580 graphics card HP ZR24W Monitor 1900 X 1200 24" Thrustmaster Warthog joystick Saitek Combat rudder pedals TrackIr 5 |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Hopefully, I'll be able to find out for myself when the custom build from Scan I've ordered finally arrives: an i7/950 system, overclocked to 3.80GHz from 3.06GHz. If it doesn't make any noticeable difference, I'll probably turn the overclocking off. No point in toasting the system for a few FPS, and this beast is going to use quite enough power anyway.
(Incidentally, if anyone else is thinking of ordering a system from Scan, don't take their estimated delivery times too seriously - they seem to work on Oleg time, and '10 working days' seems to equal a month. I'd have been prepared to accept this anyway if they'd been more realistic, but it is irritating to have to be given overoptimistic estimates time and again.) |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
that being said, ive found that if i run a custom mission with over 100 planes in the air, 4.5ghz gives me a min fps of 20 over land, while with 3.7ghz im in the single digits. hope this helps. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
I think that Intel and AMD wouldn't mind...
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
I bet it was a GeForce 6800 which refused to go Ultra....
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
But personally I've also never had anything actually stop working as a result of overclocking, not permanently anyway. (I did see some smoke coming from my old PC once, which was alarming, after a particularly stressful overclock. ) Nowadays I just leave everything at factory settings... |
|
|