![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
the new G loading on aircraft has wreak the P47
you can't dive bomb in the 47 no more with breaking or damaging the aircraft were it will not fly properly.It that bad i can dive bomb in a spit and not break up and try and do the same in a p47 break my wings off. in some of my test did i don't even get blackout before the aircraft is breaking up. Because the way the G loading is model it hasn't taken in account for aircraft like the P47. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting I thought the "Jug" has a very high dive speed. It also looks like it could withstand enormous G load. I think it has something to do with the bomb load as well Steppie.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Welcome to the club.
Same goes for the 190. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This video shows the dive restrictions of the P-47, I think it´s a good source to compare.
Last edited by [URU]Amraam; 01-28-2011 at 11:43 AM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
No snap rolling and no inverted flying !!! Dive speeds from the video max 500mph IAS under 5000ft Last edited by KG26_Alpha; 01-21-2011 at 01:34 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The real problem is not the damage-model as it is now, but that it simply wasn't there before.
This allowed a lot of people to grow some habbits, especially with BnZ that allowed them to rule the skys and defy the laws of physics. Now somebody flipped the switch and those who mastered using the gameflaws before, now have a hard time to adapt. It's not the modelling, that's porked. It's the habbits some people nursed for 10 years. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
should be posted in the bomb fuzing thread also!
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, it's the matter between playability and historical accuracy, isn't it? I was flying 190 with 500 kgs bomb and got bounced by p51. In a gentle turn with speed less than 350 km, I heard air frame wracking sound yet again, which forced me dropping my bomb and started one on one fighting with p51. I managed to survive and get a kill but I had to fly back to base to bring another bomb that wasted 20 minutes. I would greatly appreciate if anyone can provide any historical proof that this could happen in real plane and why Oleg had not introduced this feature for the last 9 years!
Salute, DrJet |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
We always begged for more realism, Luftwaffe and Allied pilots the same. Just remember the numerous Spitfire-complains about unrealistic maneuvers and stuff like that. The same way FW190 was claimed to be uber. Now both are more realistic and you still whine? What's the point? And about that example you made: Sorry, but the FW-190 is not an A-10. If you don't think a simply 500kg-Bomb would make that much of a difference, maybe you should read some books. The FW empty weight was only 3 tons! That means you added 1/6th of it's total weight + a lot of drag and wonder why you can't dogfight with it any longer? Are you kidding? The more I read about these complains, the more I'm remembered to this (slightly changed) famous quote: Crowd: "I want the truth!" OM: "You can't handle the truth!" Seems some people really can't. IMHO it's alright, but they shouldn't come here and tell people IL2 was more realistic without taking weight and structural integrity into account. Last edited by Bricks; 01-21-2011 at 05:36 PM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|