#21
|
|||
|
|||
I have an overclocked single core, and the gpu and ram make the biggest difference. I get 190max fps on black death perfect. People seem to think you need the biggest and baddest system to play these games. Go educate yourself on money saving.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
some spec
All i can find is about video at the ubi shop on IL-2 COD
NEW 3D ENGINE Latest-gen graphics engine with DX10 and DX11 API support. Huge variety of photorealistic ground vehicles, buildings and other environmental elements recreate minute details of 1940s Europe. Not a real lot i know but it's a start the rest will come later may be in the weekly update if the is one now it has a release date. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Triggaar and furbs. System is a custombuilt that did not get picked up after buyer did a no show. I got the wholesale price for the sum of the parts. Was going to get a 2600k but that ended up being $700 more from Newegg than this.
The plan is to see how CoD runs and then probably go either 3x27 or 3xhp30w. My brain wants the hp's but the pocket book says $800 more for 3 more inches per screen is a bit silly. There's also a possibility that the game does not scale well in sli. If that's the case 3x30 is probably going to be a slide show and I'll go with 3x27. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
I would say if you have a system 2 years old or newer you should be able to run the game on pretty high settings. If you are running a single core or a gpu thats over 3 years old, or have less than 3 gig ram..........you really need to upgrade.
Just my opinion. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
You dont need a monster pc, but a single core wont be able to hack this game in any decent manner. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Remember that Il2-1946 is a sim based on a 10 - 12 year old engine, so running blackdeath is not comparable to running a modern sim. |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
I plan to keep my current system and see just exactly how it's going to run b4 I make any decisions concerning such a large amount of money. I figure i should be able to run at least medium settings at 1650 x 1050. IMO that is good enough for awhile, and i'll eventually invest in a GTX 580 and a new Corsair 750w PS. I have a bit more headroom to overclock my CPU as well, so I'm not really worried about going out and spending tons of money right away. But i suppose if the money isn't an issue for some than go for it. It's always nice to play on maximum settings with good fps
__________________
- 2500k @ 4.8Ghz Lapped IHS - AsRock P67 Extreme4 Gen3 - MSI GTX 560 Ti 2Gb - Crutial M4 SATA3 64Gb SSD - 8Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600Mhz @ 8-8-8-21 RAM - Silverstone 750w Fully Modular PSU - Antec 1200 ATX Case - Zalman 9700 Cooler - Win7 Ultimate x64 - |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
__________________
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
I'm not going to upgrade anything, apart from RAM maybe and that's mostly in order to be able to run other software in the background while i'm flying.
My system is: Mobo: Asus P6T deluxe v2 CPU: i7 920 @ 2.7 GHz (completely stock, no overclocking whatsoever) GPU: Ati 4890 1GB Storage: 1.5 TB Western Digital Green 5000RPM or thereabouts (aka "low power consumption/noise but slow") purely for storage and 1.5 TB Seagate (the faster among the two, to install software and games into) PSU: 700 watt Heroichi Cougar RAM: 3GB, i might potentially bump this up to 6GB but no more than that. I built it in spring 2008 for 1180 Euros, got a Dell 22" IPS monitor for 250 Euros three months later, bought the 4890 for 180 in Xmas season 2008 when my original 4870 died and used the 3-year warranty money from the busted 4870 to get the WD disk. All in all, 1600 Euros during the past two years. I don't know why, but for some reason i'm quite confident that it will run well enough for me. Sure, i will experiment with the graphics options and sure, i might momentarily be a little jealous of people who have dual 5970s, but i am definitely not going to lose any sleep over it as long as it looks equal to or better than what we've seen in the weekly updates and does it at sufficient frame rates. Last edited by Blackdog_kt; 01-19-2011 at 08:32 AM. |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
+1
|
|
|