#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Apparently during a demo flight of the de Havilland Hornet the pilot flew it with both propellers feathered, then restarted one engine and put on an aerobatics display.
Last edited by NZtyphoon; 09-25-2012 at 01:37 AM. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
I have never managed to keep a 110 flying on one engine in CoD, probably carrying too much fuel. The He111 is quite easy to fly on one engine.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
That is not realistic. Quote:
There is not a single twin engine aircraft ever designed that operating on a single engine unintentionally was not an emergency procedure.
__________________
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
In the P-38 Flight Operating Instructions, located in Chapter
IV EMERGENCY PROCEDURES, you will find the instructions for single engine operation on page 39, section 5.
__________________
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Here are a few more P-38 accounts..
That prove it was no big deal to fly on one engine.. Keep in mind these accounts are from actual military trained pilots that flew the P-38 WWII! That is to say, a modern civ trained pilot may read something in the pilots manual some 70 years after the fact and falsly conclude that all twins require must land ASAP and avoid any sort of maneuver other than level flight while looking for a place to ditch.. But as you can see from the following accounts, that was not the case at all Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Enjoy!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Obviously, they got it all wrong and you are right. Quote:
__________________
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Its groundhog day again, and its always the same person.......
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Groundhog day or not, flying on one engine is an emergency procedure. Doesn't necessarily imply immediate, mortal danger.
|
|
|