Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #281  
Old 03-29-2012, 05:04 AM
MegOhm MegOhm is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: SoCal Wine Country
Posts: 142
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by =FI=Scott View Post
Slightly OT as its more of a technical thread topic but I did test this and got rid of offline ctd's by going back to DX9 in the config settings. The downside was visual artifacts (mainly on coastlines) and lower performance. How this would work out online I do not know.

Back OT. I've backed off these threads and boards in general simply because what is being discussed is for the time being an endless repitition of what has been said many times before. The forums won't move forward until the game does.
Yah OT ...but interesting.. I flew a custom MP mission tonight for over an hour after I flew a stock SP mission that crashed after 9 minutes

If you have an AMD Card...try Land Shading on Low and see if that helps eliminate the shoreline artifacts... that worked for me
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Dover Harbor LT Scripted.jpg (120.8 KB, 88 views)
File Type: jpg Littlestone1[1].jpg (98.3 KB, 76 views)
File Type: jpg Ramsgate in Sight[1].jpg (96.8 KB, 75 views)

Last edited by MegOhm; 03-30-2012 at 04:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #282  
Old 03-29-2012, 05:20 AM
Troll2k Troll2k is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 722
Default

I was referring to a quote from a Ubi representative.

"Ok, just had another phone call from Phil Brannelly he has confirmed what most of us already knew, Ubisoft are no longer involved with SOW period"

It just sounded like a contradiction to me.

Maybe he meant on the development side and not the publisher side.
Reply With Quote
  #283  
Old 03-29-2012, 06:54 AM
mazex's Avatar
mazex mazex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chivas View Post
UBISOFT is involved as the Western Publisher, that doesn't mean they have the power to decide when the sim could be released, but could demand that the sim provide the epilepsy filter before they would publish in the West. We were mainly talking about who has financial control and that would be the main investor the IC Company.
Agree, and the most interesting part is actually that someone still sponsors the development which is all I really care about. What people here seems to forget is that things can change very fast when investors get tired... From one month hiring staff to taking down the sign the other happens all the time...

/mazex
__________________
i7 2600k @ 4.5 | GTX580 1.5GB (latest drivers) | P8Z77-V Pro MB | 8GB DDR3 1600 Mhz | SSD (OS) + Raptor 150 (Games) + 1TB WD (Extra) | X-Fi Fatality Pro (PCI) | Windows 7 x64 | TrackIR 4 | G940 Hotas
Reply With Quote
  #284  
Old 03-29-2012, 08:10 AM
=FI=Scott =FI=Scott is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 91
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MegOhm View Post
Yah OT ...but interesting.. I flew a custom MP mission tonight for over an hour after I flew a stock SP mission that crashed after 9 minutes

If you have an AMD Card...try Land Shading on Low and see if that helps... worked for me

Thanks,

Dropping the clockspeeds on myGTX570 (in DX10 mode) did it for me. Just a fraction from stock. Don't know how it would be with multiplayer and I dont know why it works. Temps were cool and everything else I have runs fine on stock clocks. Weird.
Reply With Quote
  #285  
Old 03-29-2012, 08:40 AM
Opitz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
We cannot wait to prove our detractors wrong, crush the competition, and give our fans what they are looking for with our next major release!
Hmm... I found this quite similar to one wrong strategy, historically proven - lets try England - hm, didnt work out, lets move to Moscow...


Btw... does it mean, your team of great programmers will give next major release as Free to Play? Or at least some demo first, just to check if we have too old PCs for it? Just hope you will prove "detractors" wrong by releasing demo, not alpha as final product...

Last edited by Opitz; 03-29-2012 at 08:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #286  
Old 03-29-2012, 08:57 AM
Insuber Insuber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 1,406
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Opitz View Post
Hmm... I found this quite similar to one wrong strategy, historically proven - lets try England - hm, didnt work out, lets move to Moscow...
That's unfair. Ilya showed the right motivation, I cannot help understanding your analogy apart from the theaters of operations.
Reply With Quote
  #287  
Old 03-29-2012, 12:57 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Opitz View Post
Hmm... I found this quite similar to one wrong strategy, historically proven - lets try England - hm, didnt work out, lets move to Moscow...
Were you hoping that he'd offer to surrender?
Reply With Quote
  #288  
Old 03-29-2012, 02:31 PM
jamesdietz's Avatar
jamesdietz jamesdietz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Seattle,WashingtonUSA
Posts: 758
Default

777 Studios - Jason
( This is probably a bit OT & unsollicited,but...
I just wanted to say what a good job I feel 777 studios is doing with RoF,in particulat their website design,whicj makes good clear announcements from time to time & show plenty of screenshots of up & coming features.Although I can't say I'm fond of buying new aircraft,at least the store makes it easy to do.It seems like a very professional out fit.
All this and a steadily improving Sim too. RoF hit the market a very flawed Game , but after a year's time it was clear it was in the market to stay. I really wish the folks at Clod can follow 777's example. )

Last edited by jamesdietz; 03-29-2012 at 04:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #289  
Old 03-29-2012, 02:35 PM
Ze-Jamz Ze-Jamz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On your six!!
Posts: 2,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesdietz View Post
777 Studios - Jason
( This is probably a bit OT & unsollicited,but...
I just wanted to say what a good job I feel 777 studios is doing with RoF,in particulat their website design,whicj makes good clear announcements from time to time & show plenty of screenshots of up & coming features.Although I can't say I'm fond of buying new aircraft,at least the store makes it easy to do.It seems like a very professional out fit.
All this and a stedily improving Sim too. RoF hit the market a very flwed Game , but after a year's time it was clear it was in the market to stay. I really wish the folks at Clod can follow 777's example. )
Careful what you wish for..Im OK with DLC but would rather not be forced into that option to carry on enjoying a game
Reply With Quote
  #290  
Old 03-29-2012, 04:23 PM
jamesdietz's Avatar
jamesdietz jamesdietz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Seattle,WashingtonUSA
Posts: 758
Default

Ze-Jamz-
You're right-RoF's not perfect (& I get shot down a lot too,while trying to see around those two rather large wings!)
I guess what I am trying to say is that they've handled teir website & releases quite a bit better than over here,& there are not nearly the number of just plain angry ,nearly unprintable emotions seen here either by people who are very annoyed at the progress of things.I think IC or Ubisoft ( whome ever...) could do a lot better job of PR than they have managed thus far.They did a nice job way back when with the original Il-2 with their Friday posts & way back at the beginning news of SoW ( now CloD) they posted regular screenshots & lots of them,but now its almost like pulling teeth .They need a more 'official " way of calming the waters with more info,telling us about what happened to other flyables in Clod & why they won't be showing up ( or will in the future,) what has caused FPS issues, when will loadouts work, Battle of Moscow ( or whatever it will be called,) & difference between it & CloD,when & if modders will be involved ( over at Il-2 - it really took off when SAS & AAS got going- they changed everything...)and perhaps more visuals,vids & screenies. It wouldn't take much , but it seems like PR & friendly marketing has eluded the developers.
Having said all of this I really enjoy the sim even with poor FPS & anxious about the up coming patch...hmmm... now about that patch...I wonder when....????

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.