Fresh stuff from sukhoi.ru (Discussion) - Page 29

JG52Uther · #**281** 12-12-2011, 04:06 PM

We all are, but it seems we won't find out yet.

BPickles · #**282** 12-12-2011, 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Insuber

Why? We will have a patch, we will have a sequel, so what's wrong?

Really? Well first you need a patch to fix the game so you have working game to place a sequel into, and if you hadn't noticed they wont talk about an issue that isn't coding or financial etc but its put everything on hold maybe even till next year.
That sounds gloomy to me.
Sorry but i cant help think that especially after the Epilepsy Filter fiasco.

BlackSix · #**283** 12-12-2011, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by addman

Interpretation time! When you say "I did not say anything about the modular structure", does that mean that the sequel may or may NOT be a stand-alone expansion to CloD and maybe even a totally separate game?

This means that I'm not ready to confirm any facts about the sequel.

addman · #**284** 12-12-2011, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackSix

This means that I'm not ready to confirm any facts about the sequel.

Ok thanks for the answer BS.

Hmm...so basically "Battle of Moscow" might be any type of module (expansion, sequel, stand-alone expansion etc.), interesting but also a bit disconcerting.

Adlerhorst · #**285** 12-12-2011, 05:46 PM

Does Black Six mean he is not READY to confirm -- or that he is not ready to CONFIRM. One implies he can confirm but isn't; the other he is but CAN'T. God, now I'm really bummed, out of airspeed, altitude and ideas, as empty as Ms whats-er-name's orifice

.

Chivas · #**286** 12-12-2011, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by addman

Ok thanks for the answer BS.

Hmm...so basically "Battle of Moscow" might be any type of module (expansion, sequel, stand-alone expansion etc.), interesting but also a bit disconcerting.

I agree addman... with all the negative rumours going around I'm not sure why they can't say wether or not the sequel will be standalone, and/or merged installation. This is the problem....people are suggesting that work has stopped on COD and nothing they are doing to the sequel will apply to COD. Which doesn't make any sense whatsoever. I can't see the developers cutting their own throat with that action, but if that were correct the community would have a reason to be really p*ssed.

I can understand BS's hands are tied, but Luthier should clarify the situation, if he can't the development has bigger problems than I had hoped.

BPickles · #**287** 12-12-2011, 06:15 PM

Dude I speculate that it will get confirmed if if its an expansion. If its stand alone, no confirmation.

#**288** 12-12-2011, 06:19 PM

Well we have it in Black and White that there will be no dynamic weather in CLOD, but it will be in BOM so they cannot be compatible. Cliffs Of dover is binned, it will never be what we were told it would be, its been a beta for the more profitable BOM. We have been cheated.

Chivas · #**289** 12-12-2011, 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tree_UK

Well we have it in Black and White that there will be no dynamic weather in CLOD, but it will be in BOM so they cannot be compatible. Cliffs Of dover is binned, it will never be what we were told it would be, its been a beta for the more profitable BOM. We have been cheated.

None of what you say makes any sense if both games use the same game engine and developer, but Luthier's answers to the last questions were so vague it makes it easy to subscribe to that gloom and doom theory.

Ctrl E · #**290** 12-12-2011, 06:40 PM

I agree. Black 6 saying "I wouldn't wait for the next patch" is pretty grim.

I would take it as read that CloD has been abandoned. As as tree points out, if dynamic weather will not be "back dated" to CloD then it will not be compatible with the Moscow game.