Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #251  
Old 06-07-2011, 08:25 PM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SturmKreator View Post
Could you please fix the FM Focke Wulf?

Pretty open ended statement, don't you think?

No indication of what needs "fixed".

No evidence to back up what you want "fixed".

Translation: "I got shot down and didn't like it much."
__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
  #252  
Old 06-07-2011, 09:13 PM
SturmKreator SturmKreator is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 95
Default

Acceleration, energy retention and final velocities are wrong
  #253  
Old 06-08-2011, 02:02 AM
Grach's Avatar
Grach Grach is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 30
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by SturmKreator View Post
Acceleration, energy retention and final velocities are wrong
That doesn't really answer his question you know...
There are quite a few of the Fw-190 family in game, are they all wrong? What about the Ta-152s?

"Translation: "I got shot down and didn't like it much." Nail on the head perhaps?

Good news about the camo nets, I've bounced bullets off the damn things often enough trying to get at the prizes lurking within.
  #254  
Old 06-08-2011, 03:58 AM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SturmKreator View Post
Acceleration, energy retention and final velocities are wrong
I'm sure if you can provide all of the relevant details including the numbers and figures as well as the sources for the data they will get right on that.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
  #255  
Old 06-08-2011, 05:10 AM
Treetop64's Avatar
Treetop64 Treetop64 is offline
What the heck...?
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Redwood City, California
Posts: 513
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IceFire View Post
I'm sure if you can provide all of the relevant details including the numbers and figures as well as the sources for the data they will get right on that.
I think you might be asking a bit much of the guy...
  #256  
Old 06-08-2011, 09:27 AM
EJGr.Ost_Caspar EJGr.Ost_Caspar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 939
Default

We will include a new difficulty option: 'sensitive matters' (if activated, it includes new FMs, DMs and anything else, that can be based on feelings... polished with a random pattern - for bad days and good days).
__________________

----------------------------------------------
For bugreports, help and support contact:
daidalos.team@googlemail.com

For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications:
IL-Modeling Bible
  #257  
Old 06-08-2011, 10:54 AM
Romanator21 Romanator21 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 507
Default

  #258  
Old 06-08-2011, 06:57 PM
DD_crash's Avatar
DD_crash DD_crash is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Buckley North Wales
Posts: 307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SturmKreator View Post
Acceleration, energy retention and final velocities are wrong
When I was flying FW190s during the war they were never as in the game. Or was it they arn`t like I expect them to be?
  #259  
Old 06-08-2011, 08:13 PM
Ace1staller Ace1staller is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: somewhere in the united states
Posts: 125
Default

New question,

If you request more planes in combat from the home base, would the Stationary aircraft would be moving from its position.
  #260  
Old 06-09-2011, 02:52 AM
Avimimus Avimimus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 803
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daidalos.team View Post
We did originally have "No Paratrooper Views" in the diff UI, but it was removed since it doesn't really feel like difficulty option. More like personal preference. So it is now as additional conf.ini parameter which player can set and exclude parachutes from external views.
Excellent, good to hear.

Thanks for the reply,
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.