Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #231  
Old 08-02-2010, 09:10 AM
SaQSoN SaQSoN is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Nowhereland
Posts: 340
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diga View Post
hi

i need a help with v4.09
i have il2 platinum collection(russian version 4.07) and want to download the v4.09
which version should i choose from all the patches of 4.09?which russian version?any?

thanks
You need to install 4.08 first. Download from here:

http://files.games.1c.ru/perl_harbor...es/408m_ru.exe

Next, install 4.09, download from here:

http://files.games.1c.ru/il2_platinu...te/409m_ru.exe

You can ask questions in Russian on the official Russian forum here:

http://forums.games.1c.ru/index.php?type=topics&gid=32
Reply With Quote
  #232  
Old 08-02-2010, 09:23 AM
Diga Diga is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SaQSoN View Post
You need to install 4.08 first. Download from here:

http://files.games.1c.ru/perl_harbor...es/408m_ru.exe

Next, install 4.09, download from here:

http://files.games.1c.ru/il2_platinu...te/409m_ru.exe

You can ask questions in Russian on the official Russian forum here:

http://forums.games.1c.ru/index.php?type=topics&gid=32



thanks saqson
Reply With Quote
  #233  
Old 08-11-2010, 02:42 PM
koivis koivis is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 53
Default Bug with G4M1 range

I found this bug while testing some plane's endurances for air racing. I set up a mission on FMB using the Crimea map and the airfield next to Sevastopol. After testing some short range fighters (like Me 163) I switched to G4M1-11, and instead of 25% fuel picked only 2%.

Method is simple, take off with full power, start timer, fuel out, stop timer. Then I imported the data to Calc sheet, and got the following figures:

Fuel loadout: 2%
Endurance: 2 min 8 s
Calculated 100% fuel endurance: 1 hour 47 minutes

Which is WAY too low. Yes, I know that you don't get maximum range with full power, but let me explain. The plane's total horsepower is 3060 (2x1530), and if we assume that the specific fuel consumption of the engine is ~0,25 kg/hp/h, the total consumption is 765 kg/h. Now, according to this source, G4M1-11 had 4900 liter fuel capacity. This means ~3500 kg of fuel, and the with that amount the corresponding endurance is 4 hours 36 minutes. Of course, to get the 6000 km range, you would need to lower the engine settings, and cruise for almost 20 hours!

Now the Betty's range is only ~1/3 of its real range, which means that either the fuel capacity or consumption rate is modelled wrong. If it's too late for 4.10, I'd like to see this fixed in 4.11. I can do some more tests with other planes to see if they're ok.
__________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Redguys Air Racing Team
Member A4
www.simairracing.com

"The fastest pilots of the online world..."

Last edited by koivis; 08-11-2010 at 03:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #234  
Old 08-11-2010, 02:49 PM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

specific weight of petrol is 1,12 so 4900l equals to approx. 4.375,00 kg.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
Reply With Quote
  #235  
Old 08-11-2010, 03:11 PM
koivis koivis is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 53
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robtek View Post
specific weight of petrol is 1,12 so 4900l equals to approx. 4.375,00 kg.
Are you sure? Anyway, if specific weight of something is 1,12, 4900 liters of that can't weigh 4375 kg...
I used a value of 0,718, this is my source: http://www-static.shell.com/static/a..._100ll_pds.pdf

Also corrected a small error on previous post, wrote 2500 liters when I meant 3500. Doesn't affect the calculation, only a typo when writing the post.
__________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Redguys Air Racing Team
Member A4
www.simairracing.com

"The fastest pilots of the online world..."

Last edited by koivis; 08-11-2010 at 03:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #236  
Old 08-11-2010, 04:24 PM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

I guess the standard German B4 Fuel is more like Avgas 80/87 so you can use even lower density figures, I think it was 690kg/m3
Reply With Quote
  #237  
Old 08-12-2010, 02:36 PM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

Ok, i stand corrected, AVGAS 80 has a specific weight of 0,73 - 0,78 kg/l that would indicate a weight of 3285 to 3510 kg.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
Reply With Quote
  #238  
Old 08-23-2010, 05:19 PM
Tempest123's Avatar
Tempest123 Tempest123 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 389
Default

Just a couple of bugs: The Manifold pressure gauge is non-functional in the Macchi 202 (series VII), and when the cockpit instrument lights are put on, the fuel gauge is overlayed by an image of another instrument.
Reply With Quote
  #239  
Old 08-23-2010, 09:51 PM
EJGr.Ost_Caspar EJGr.Ost_Caspar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tempest123 View Post
Just a couple of bugs: The Manifold pressure gauge is non-functional in the Macchi 202 (series VII), and when the cockpit instrument lights are put on, the fuel gauge is overlayed by an image of another instrument.
Acknowledged. Thanks!
__________________

----------------------------------------------
For bugreports, help and support contact:
daidalos.team@googlemail.com

For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications:
IL-Modeling Bible
Reply With Quote
  #240  
Old 08-24-2010, 11:29 AM
69th_GenSwat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazarus View Post
I know that many don't think highly of the 185, but it seems that something has definitely changed. It does nothing but stall. The MC205 also seems a lot more unstable.

Could it be stick settings? I have always used Crazy Ivans stick settings. Would this, some how, be different in 4.09?

Is your "yet" a polite indicator that recent FM changes have Maddox finger prints on them? It is what it is.....it's ok if the FM has been changed, but I would like to know before I go ripping into my stick configurations.
i185: 4 of them made, 2 crashed during testing, the other 2 on standby in hangers. What a mythical plane. Personally I think it is the most over modeled A/C in this game to date... can sustain a Climb on a 44 Fw190 D9 no stalls or wing overs... Can get to 7k meters in no time flat... mater of fact. I have yet to see a max service ceiling for this plane... you could orbit the moon and then some in my experiences with it...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.