![]() |
|
FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
But just because you missed the TECHNICAL INTELLIGENCE (T-2 AMC) statement, i.e. Quote:
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wouldn't drive a Renault on 'slick' tyres either on a rainy day on a mountain road..
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It did have 4x 30mm canon! Big low velocity rounds... ridicules fire power.
So it wasn't a sharp shooting sniper of a plane at high speed. The weapons they put on it did not need to be aimed terribly precisely I suspect. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Didn't Galland, who flew both the 262 and the Meteor F4, say that the 262 with the engines of the F4 would have made for the best plane?
262 was not alone, Meteor had snaking issue too, as had Lockheed P-80: http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...-80A-85044.pdf |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
There is a good reason nobody else in the world used hydraulically boosted controls at the time. Lockheed pushed them but it was well into the 1950's before they technology worked even close to what was intended.
__________________
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The flying wings of the day all exhibited the "snaking" problem to an even greater degree.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|