Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-05-2012, 01:27 PM
ATAG_Snapper's Avatar
ATAG_Snapper ATAG_Snapper is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,286
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5./JG27.Farber View Post
You doing it wrong. At 100m's I get 460 Km/H IAS at 1.3 Ata and at 5km's I get 420 Km/H at 1.3 Ata...

I have tracks if you want them.
No need for tracks from you, Farber, AFAIC. As with IvanK, if you say it is, then it is.
__________________
  #12  
Old 06-05-2012, 02:38 PM
5./JG27.Farber 5./JG27.Farber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,958
Default

Thats going in my sig...
  #13  
Old 06-05-2012, 04:54 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IvanK View Post
Attached graphic is my Speed test in CLOD current version + Hot fix.
Blue Line my results, Broken line Spit I spec, full line Spit II spec

METHOD
Each run commenced on altitude with stabilised Oil/Rad temps Oil Temp at 80deg C. Rad Full open (At present I cannot detect any Rad drag so radiator position is not relevant imo)
Each altitude was a specific FMB set up. Altitude maintained +-50ft throughout the test. QNH checked as 992mb on the specific map used.
Each run done 3 times and Vmax average plotted.
Seal level temp estimated 19 deg C based on HEIII OAT gauge on the same map on the ground. TAS calculation based on standard 2 deg C lapse rate from the surface. so at 16,000ft I was using an OAT of -13deg C
My test wt 114lbs less as reported by FMB than the spec wt

Power setting was Full throttle 3000RPM. Indicated Boost +6. Now its important to understand that displayed Boost is not I believe actually measured in the FM but represents an angular animation value. We all know that it should be indicating +9 in the Spit II.

I gave up testing at 17,000ft as things were radically different from the spec values.

Results plotted as accurately as I could.


If someone wants to convert the test values to Standard day figures ... go for it.
It appears a little pessimistic.

Ballparking it off the data you gave I get your Density Altitude at 14000 feet as ~15500 ft.

It looks like the FTH then is ~1000 feet low and the aircraft is about 3% off in SL Vmax.
  #14  
Old 06-05-2012, 04:58 PM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATAG_Snapper View Post
I've also found a pronounced difference in FM for the Spitfire IIa between offline and online. The two FM's are the same at SL, but I found the IIa's online FM takes a remarkable departure from the offline FM as altitude increases.
Snapper, try adjusting the Altimeter barometric setting in both cases at the same field until it reads zero feet or as near as you can get. Is it the same baro setting in each case or are you seeing different atmospheric conditions?

In my own created server and in ATAG I find the correct setting 'on line' for Tangmere (which is about 39feet) is 995mb. Based on that I set 995 at Manston and get 140 feet in both servers. IOn off-line single mission Free Flight over England after landing Manston I have to set 996 to get 140 feet. So different types of 'day' perhaps?
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders
  #15  
Old 06-05-2012, 05:02 PM
ATAG_Snapper's Avatar
ATAG_Snapper ATAG_Snapper is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,286
Default

Maybe that's it, Klem.

Except, the Ia's FM's agree very closely under the exact same test conditions offline vs online. The IIa's FM's do not.
__________________

Last edited by ATAG_Snapper; 06-05-2012 at 05:27 PM.
  #16  
Old 06-05-2012, 05:16 PM
5./JG27.Farber 5./JG27.Farber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,958
Default

Me and my wingman often have 200m's defference staring from the same field on our altimeters.
  #17  
Old 06-05-2012, 05:21 PM
ATAG_Snapper's Avatar
ATAG_Snapper ATAG_Snapper is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,286
Default

3% off in SL Vmax?

((267 mph TAS actual - 287 mph TAS spec) x 100)/(287 mph TAS spec) = -7%

or am I doing this wrong?
__________________
  #18  
Old 06-05-2012, 09:10 PM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5./JG27.Farber View Post
Me and my wingman often have 200m's defference staring from the same field on our altimeters.
??!!

Both have same baro setting?
Reading from the tooltip or the gauge needle?
Tooltips are to nearest 100 feet in RAF planes so one a/c at 90 feet and one at 105 feet will read 0 and 100 respectively.

Or the 109s are porked and next time I will run from a 109 at 25 feet and see what happens behind me
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders
  #19  
Old 06-05-2012, 10:37 PM
5./JG27.Farber 5./JG27.Farber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,958
Default

We both take off and he'll say 2000m's and Ill say what? we are are at 2200. Read from the needle.
  #20  
Old 06-05-2012, 10:46 PM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

Easiest way to set accurate QNH is set the Altimeter to the field elevation. Field elevation can be found in FMB. Attached file has every airfield's elevation in the Sim all obtained from FMB.

A 1mb error should only result in 30ft/10m error.

I do believe the default maps have some diurnal variation in both Temperature and pressure. I too have seen 992mb as the setting on ATAG at some times and 995mb at other times.
Attached Files
File Type: zip ClodAfldElev2.zip (64.7 KB, 13 views)

Last edited by IvanK; 06-05-2012 at 10:54 PM.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.