Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-28-2012, 03:38 AM
Robert's Avatar
Robert Robert is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 717
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ataros View Post
I can post a new thread with a link to spyware. But is there any reason to download anything that does not come from B6 or luthier, does not have current date and reasonable readme text? People must take responsibility for their actions one day. It is called growing up.

When they do grow up they hopefully stop blaming the devs for purchasing a product they did not want to buy. Grown ups take responsibility for their actions. Kids blame others for their actions.
I agree. People have to take responsibility for their actions. I hope joker enjoys his banning because no one else is responsible for his actions except him. I did read the date of the topic and acted responsibly by not DLing the patch. Foobar's (I think it was him - could care less who) attempt was to trap people into doing what some did. It was malicious and at the very least mean spirited. Isn't there enough of that sh!t in this forum already?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-28-2012, 04:51 AM
FG28_Kodiak FG28_Kodiak is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Swabia->Bavaria->Germany
Posts: 884
Default

Best would be the mods make a new section for old beta patches and store the threads there. So it's impossible to fake the release of a patch, any longer. The problem is not all looking for the date.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-28-2012, 06:10 AM
priller26 priller26 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 266
Default

So this whole beta patch was a joke played on us? Thank god I didnt delete my cache.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-28-2012, 06:18 AM
drewpee drewpee is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 427
Default

What a mean immature thing to do. It's always a great joke until it's you who gets stuffed around. To defend such a thing it like saying "she wore a short skirt so she deserved it". I love a joke but when it's at some one else's expense your not funny, your just a low life.

PS. Thanks for the warning pstile.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-28-2012, 07:36 AM
mazex's Avatar
mazex mazex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ataros View Post
I can post a new thread with a link to spyware. But is there any reason to download anything that does not come from B6 or luthier, does not have current date and reasonable readme text? People must take responsibility for their actions one day. It is called growing up.

When they do grow up they hopefully stop blaming the devs for purchasing a product they did not want to buy. Grown ups take responsibility for their actions. Kids blame others for their actions.
Well, having worked for many years with developing financial systems I must disagree... Everyone is not that "suspicious of mind" (like me for example ). You would be amazed at the stuff that intelligent users has tried to make over the years overriding explicit warning windows many times That's of course just one of the reasons financial systems have validation checks in every layer of the system, but customer/employee errors with large amounts are more common than one may think!

And then we talk about stuff that if the system had not stopped the transaction further down the chain would lead to a lot worse stuff than applying an old necro bumped patch to CloD
__________________
i7 2600k @ 4.5 | GTX580 1.5GB (latest drivers) | P8Z77-V Pro MB | 8GB DDR3 1600 Mhz | SSD (OS) + Raptor 150 (Games) + 1TB WD (Extra) | X-Fi Fatality Pro (PCI) | Windows 7 x64 | TrackIR 4 | G940 Hotas
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-28-2012, 08:28 AM
MD_Titus MD_Titus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 493
Default

so, no beta patch is released, toys are thrown from pram and some "little miracle" decides to trawl old patch release threads, bumps them and bitch and whine and moan about not getting a beta patch released right now?

ip ban, surely? there's (arguably justified/arguably false sense of entitlement) griping and then there's being a worthless trolling scumbag.
__________________
specs -
OS - Win7 64 bit
CPU - Intel Core2duo x6800 OC@3.2ghz
MOBO - MB-EVGA122CKNF68BR
RAM - ddr2 6gb @800mhz
GPU - nVidia geforce GTX 280 1gb
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-28-2012, 08:36 AM
paf paf is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 7
Default

Sorry, I have to laugh so hard! All the people shouting for a ban, you can't read?
He just commented on an old Thread and get banned?
What a Kindergarten....


Btw., look what beautiful buildings and vehicles he made for CloD...
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-28-2012, 08:48 AM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paf View Post
Sorry, I have to laugh so hard! All the people shouting for a ban, you can't read?
He just commented on an old Thread and get banned?
What a Kindergarten....


Btw., look what beautiful buildings and vehicles he made for CloD...

So what......it's like building an orphanage and then burning it down.
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-28-2012, 09:04 AM
paf paf is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 7
Default

Don't you think, you are (and all the ban-screamers) taking this all abit too serious? It seems this is almost religion to some people here on the boards.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-28-2012, 09:09 AM
pstyle pstyle is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paf View Post
Don't you think, you are (and all the ban-screamers) taking this all abit too serious? It seems this is almost religion to some people here on the boards.
the OP?
No.

Aren't you being a bit OTT with your reply?

To all
If you don't need appreciate or need the headline here then move on.
No need to be a five year old and leave rather pathetic comments. The thread is just here to quickly highlight the pitfall of not properly reading the other thread, and getting caught out, which a number of people seemed to have done.

How about we think a little bit more about looking after each other's interests, rather than just bagging people who might not have paid as much attention to the other thread as you did? Hmmm?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.