Please explain...

[Aer9o]

Originally Posted by Viking

Just STFU all of you and let them release it when they are satisfied.

Viking

Who said we do not let them release when satisfied, all people want is some clarification as they indicated things are close to be finished! So before you post something here go read...and hope you too will have a nice afternoon STFU!

[MBF]

Originally Posted by Aer9o

I do devolop different things, however I am a fan of series since day one of release of the original IL2. I am a veteran simmer with other titles as well such as FSX, REX, ORBX + various addons, as well as BETA tester for a new tiltle which I would not like to mention here! I think this is enough to vouch for my opinion !

Not really. what Artist said is correct. Testing is done for a reason: to avoid releasing buggy software.

[Aer9o]

Originally Posted by MBF

Not really. what Artist said is correct. Testing is done for a reason: to avoid releasing buggy software.

What buggy mate? this is BETA testing! for us to find the buggs and report back!
If they would have released something so far it could have helped speeding up things !

Originally Posted by Viking

Just STFU all of you and let them release it when they are satisfied.

Viking

Good to see that Vikings haven't lost their subtle touch over the years.


Your not the mighty Techno Viking are you?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fvLs5KXWYI

[Triggaaar]

Originally Posted by the Dutchman

...only last week it was almost ready for release,and now it didn't pass?
Only one of these 2 statements can be right,not both!

No, that's incorrect. If it's ready, then it doesn't need to be tested, because to be ready it must already have been tested. If it's almost ready, then it is, by definition, not yet ready. It needed to be tested, and it failed the test. That's software for you.

Originally Posted by Aer9o

I agree we need some clarity on this one!

I DEMAND AN EXPLANATION FOR THIS OUTRAGE!

I shall be writing to my MP at once.

[flyingblind]

I think there is a recent post, probably in the Thursday update thread, where someone found a post by B6 where he was answering a similar question on Sukhoi forum and he said some graphical artifacts had appeared. Don't quote me on that though as I don't have time to go back and search.

[MBF]

Originally Posted by Aer9o

What buggy mate? this is BETA testing! for us to find the buggs and report back!
If they would have released something so far it could have helped speeding up things !

Precisely, it is beta testing. What is the point of releasing a beta if it doesn't pass their own testing? To get the same bug report(s) a million times?. That doesn't speed up anything.

Originally Posted by flyingblind

I think there is a recent post, probably in the Thursday update thread, where someone found a post by B6 where he was answering a similar question on Sukhoi forum and he said some graphical artifacts had appeared. Don't quote me on that though as I don't have time to go back and search.

It wasn't that big rectangular lake in France was it?

[taildraggernut]

Originally Posted by MBF

Precisely, it is beta testing. What is the point of releasing a beta if it doesn't pass their own testing? To get the same bug report(s) a million times?. That doesn't speed up anything.

Quoted for the absolute point.

They release a beta with problems they know about and everybody will just be sending bug reports about a problem they know about, even a beta is meant to be a working solution.

Originally Posted by taildraggernut

Quoted for the absolute point.

They release a beta with problems they know about and everybody will just be sending bug reports about a problem they know about, even a beta is meant to be a working solution.

They released a game with far more problems than this beta appears to have, if they have fixed the CTD's then they will allow me and many many others to finally be able to play the game, we are currently in Alpha mode anyway, this beta patch would make the game Beta, which is only a good thing.