Thursday Update Speed graphs

[David198502]

if they can do it for the G50(which really seems close to the pilot manual), they should be able to do it for all the other planes as well....we will have to wait for the RAF graphs to judge, but at least the 109 graph shows still a pretty big gap between the ingame performance and the pilotmanual curve.

if they get all the planes as accurate as the G50, then im happy...

[Buchon]

I saw something in those graphs, a common pattern in all planes graphs, that unveil that they reached the limits of the coded FM simulation, specially at high altitude.

Looks that they are trying to deal with it, trying reach the point close to reality as is possible, until the next FM code revision that is mentioned to be in BoM.

[VO101_Tom]

Originally Posted by 5./JG27.Farber

I just hope they are ALL closer to reality than what we have now.

+1
Promising the known graphs, there is no reason to think that the British aircraft performance will be less accurate. IvanK, thank your time and effort, and the Devs that willing to change it.

[addman]

They'll never show the red planes graphs, this place would implode if they did.

[JG52Uther]

G50 FTW! Who wants a 'statwhore' plane when you can fly a Fiat!

[klem]

Originally Posted by SEE

Would be nice to see the graphs but, to avoid disappointment (and possible heart attacks...), all I expect for the allied fighters is what was stated in the last two updates - a Reduction in speed at all altitudes for the Rotol Hurri/Spit Mk2, a correction for the speed drop in the Spit Mk1's at 6K+ and correction to the indicated climb rate for Spit2 and Rotol Hurri .


What is there to have an heart attack about?.....:rolleyes:

Now where did i put my pilot notes for the G50 and 109?

How about no mention of an increase in Spitfire MkI/Ia performance as reported in the Bug Tracker as Feature #84, not to mention a myriad of posts?

Are we still to be stuck with an underperforming Spitfire? I'm not blindly speculating, the Thursday update reported the specific changes and that was not one of them.