![]() |
|
FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I always liked Hurricanes for some reason. You say Spitfire and even little kids will know what you're talking about. You say Hurricane and they think you'll start talking about the southern United States.
Then again if you say Messerschmitt you might get......."What mess where"? |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() +1 to the thread starter and an interesting read so far
__________________
Cheers |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() - one illustrating the drag generated by fabric covered early wing design - the other showing the early Hurri internal structure Early Hurri = MkI The Rotol hurri had alrdy metal covered wing (mkIa) Perso as a child I liked very much the Hurricane with it's strange rear fuselage structure that looks better as a 1/72th model. Thx Sutts for providing us with raw "intelligence" data from 1c. ![]() Ths Spit spar with the big adjusting bolt is simply too scary to stare at ! Last edited by TomcatViP; 01-20-2012 at 10:31 AM. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Interesting pics there TomcatViP, thanks. I wasn't aware of the early fabric covered wings on the Hurri. I guess if the fabric burnt away it would fly like a brick ![]() |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Current values for iL2CoD wing damage model
![]() BF109E: WingL0 & WingR0 - Durability 90 WingL1 & WingR1 - Durability 122 WingL2 & WingR2 - Durability 73 WingL3 & WingR3 - Durability 87 WingL4 & WingR4 - Durability 68 WingL5 & WingR5 - Durability 59 Spitfire: WingL0 & WingR0 - Durability 100 WingL1 & WingR1 - Durability 100 WingL2 & WingR2 - Durability 100 WingL3 & WingR3 - Durability 100 WingL4 & WingR4 - Durability 100 WingL5 & WingR5 - Durability 100 WingL6 & WingR6 - Durability 100 WingL7 & WingR7 - Durability 100 Hurricane: WingL0 & WingR0 - Durability 118 WingL1 & WingR1 - Durability 99 WingL2 & WingR2 - Durability 266 WingL3 & WingR3 - Durability 122 WingL4 & WingR4 - Durability 151 WingL5 & WingR5 - Durability 98 WingL6 & WingR6 - Durability 71 WingL7 & WingR7 - Durability 1 Regards Varrattu
__________________
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit Intel Core i7-8700K CPU @ 3.70GHz 2x4gb DDR3-1600 GeForce GTX 970 4095 MB Logitech G35 Headset Logitech G940 Flight System (fw 1.42) Mad Catz Strike7 Keyboard Headtracker DIY 6DOF & OpenTrack 2.3.10 |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are the values for the other parts of the Spitfire 100, too?
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
the current values are identical for all types of BF109E, Spitfires or Hurricanes. Most of the Spitfire values are 100 and more, for example: Nose0 - Durability 1000 Nose1 - Durability 150 Engine0 - Durability 200 Regards Varrattu PS: there are a few other values called sponger09, sponger11 etc., I have no idea what they are for... ...
__________________
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit Intel Core i7-8700K CPU @ 3.70GHz 2x4gb DDR3-1600 GeForce GTX 970 4095 MB Logitech G35 Headset Logitech G940 Flight System (fw 1.42) Mad Catz Strike7 Keyboard Headtracker DIY 6DOF & OpenTrack 2.3.10 Last edited by Varrattu; 02-06-2012 at 06:40 PM. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why should the spit be more durable than the messer? The messer is the smaller aircraft with smaller wings and its empty weight is almost identical to that of the spit. One should think that it was hence built tougher.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We can't read from that values which aircraft is tougher, because the parts may have a different size in each aircraft.
One explanation for the 100 values could be that the Spitfire is the reference implementation. If the wing of the Hurricane would be 25% tougher than that of a Spitfire it would have the value 125 and so on. |
![]() |
|
|