|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
ATI HD5870 2G Kingston DDR3 1600 6G Intel i7 980X @4.0GHz ASUS Rampage III Extreme Creative Xtreme Gamer TrackIR 4 MS FFB2 + CH pro Pedal + CH throttle Win7 64bit |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Well, we have three Yak 7's that vary only in engine output, I think. Maybe we can get an Early & Late La-5 FN flight models.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
The La-5FN didn't have two power levels, it had the same when the first and when the last came off the assembly line. What changed were construction details and manufacturing standards that gave later planes slightly better aerodynamics.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
The G6AS is a lighter aircraft AFAIR, and definitely more agile than than all G6s and later 109s.
If I remember correctly it's turning circle time is about 2 seconds less than the other 109s. I specifically choose this aircraft online when up against Spits, Yak3s and LA5s. Has less hitting power, requires sniping, but gives the 'allies' a real headache.. at least you get home
__________________
Last edited by K_Freddie; 01-10-2012 at 06:51 PM. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
In real life there was a substantial weight difference, something like a 150kg heavier in the G6 from what I recall. 150kg makes a big difference.
Quote:
Not sure if that remains the case in the latest patches the G2 may now be fixed. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
At higher altitudes the G6as has performance approaching a K14 but turns like a G6. Its just a nice plane to fly. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Ok guys, as your suggestion, I did a comparsoin with L5F.
but G6 still can not fly away from it @7000m, L5f has 10km/h adavantage. I doubt same thing would happen on climbrate comparsoin. only 150kg and 2 bubbles can make such big difference?
__________________
ATI HD5870 2G Kingston DDR3 1600 6G Intel i7 980X @4.0GHz ASUS Rampage III Extreme Creative Xtreme Gamer TrackIR 4 MS FFB2 + CH pro Pedal + CH throttle Win7 64bit |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Incidently, unless the MW50 is automatic at full throttle... I've never used these extra power goodies - always worked my way around them.
__________________
Last edited by K_Freddie; 01-11-2012 at 06:38 PM. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Just did some tests cause i didn't believe it. 100% fuel, rads closed, Smolensk, La5f and Bf109G6 late, Stock 4.10.1. Speeds attained by getting to altitude and then accelerated up to top speed and holding for a min. Here's the il2 compare data, Bf109G6 late, La5f Both within a few of the il2 data, probably cause i used smolensk rather than crimea, but there still relative to each other. Quote:
Last edited by fruitbat; 01-11-2012 at 11:01 PM. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
If you can add upwards of 3-5mph to the top speed of an aircraft just by polishing the leading edges and other aerodynamic surfaces (see RAF V-1 chasers), then... 150 kg and the gun bulges on a 109G-6 are more than likely to cause some significant differences.
In both real life and in-game, the 109G-6 is considered by many to be the worst of the 109 series. It seems like there were a few too many concessions to make it capable in the heavy bomber interceptor role. The later models have tradeoffs for the higher performance but they at least have some more significant advantages.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
|
|