A good idea on the performance issues - Page 2

pupo162 · #11 06-13-2011, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JG52Krupi

I am not being dramatic I am looking at the big picture. We can't agree on anything in this community thus this will just lead to more arguments.

Also if you do get a rubbish aircraft you will find ppl will turn around and land and keep on doing this until they have the best version, come on we KNOW that this will happen.

how would you know you have a lesser performer aircraift??? would you waste 10 mins of oyur life doing a speed test over the base? even tough teh speed is altered by the climeteric conditions?

maybe 3% is a litle bit to much, 1% or maybe 2 would semm more proper reducing or increasing somehting like 5 to 10 kmh.

JG52Krupi · #12 06-13-2011, 02:44 PM

Lol I can just imagine some of the arguments that would occur online

JG52Krupi · #13 06-13-2011, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pupo162

how would you know you have a lesser performer aircraift??? would you waste 10 mins of oyur life doing a speed test over the base? even tough teh speed is altered by the climeteric conditions?

maybe 3% is a litle bit to much, 1% or maybe 2 would semm more proper reducing or increasing somehting like 5 to 10 kmh.

It takes 3 mins to find out the speed of the aircraft at a certain height.

Damn at 1000 my aircraft only going x I'm going to land to try and get y.

ATAG_Doc · #14 06-13-2011, 02:50 PM

No way Jose!

pupo162 · #15 06-13-2011, 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JG52Krupi

It takes 3 mins to find out the speed of the aircraft at a certain height.

Damn at 1000 my aircraft only going x I'm going to land to try and get y.

anyway, in coops you cna go ahead and land if you dont like your plane. I dont get why wouldnt want this so bad, if it could exist, i shurly would be optional.

#16 06-13-2011, 02:56 PM

so basically what you're saying is that we can't have a realistic feature because it would be used as an advantage point? How sad is that?

Sometimes I wonder why some people even bothers with this sim and doesn't go for the arcade versions..

VO101_Tom · #17 06-13-2011, 02:59 PM

maybe, but...
Did anybody do an effect study? That this value changes something really? To this it would be necessary to know it, what now the "ingame" values. But wait a minute. We do not have an idea of this, it FM just under adaptation...

I would put even chance engine failures into it. This was a topic already here, rejected the developers (or Oleg himself), the game would not be balanced saying... No doubt, complicated case.

pupo162 · #18 06-13-2011, 03:00 PM

all engines on cod are now set to a 0.0% engine failure possibility.

JG52Krupi · #19 06-13-2011, 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger

so basically what you're saying is that we can't have a realistic feature because it would be used as an advantage point? How sad is that?

Sometimes I wonder why some people even bothers with this sim and doesn't go for the arcade versions..

Look mate I said I like the idea but you have to take into account everything and to get around the problems I mentioned you would have to have a low chance of getting the good quality aircraft or have a very low increase which would beg the question of if the developers should even bother with it.

Jatta Raso · #20 06-13-2011, 03:10 PM

i see the best of will behind this, but it just isn't the time to start asking for this perks; CoD is in enough trouble as it is right now, many of its basic functionality are flawed, and at the moment this kind of petition is asking for more trouble...

... so it's a NO

View Poll Results: Do you think Heliofly's idea would be a good solution?
yes	38	43.68%
no	37	42.53%
maybe, but..	12	13.79%
Voters: 87. You may not vote on this poll