Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-12-2011, 05:19 AM
Chivas Chivas is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,769
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slip Ball View Post
I was wondering to myself what the hell happened with the whole SOW dream. I think that the third party interest that Oleg had hoped for did not materialize, causing himself to loose interest and go to pursue other adventures. Without his supervision, perfectionism, I don't see a very bright future for cod...hope I'm wrong
Its way to early for most third parties to become involved, although the Battle for Moscow is a third party addon. COD and the game engine simply aren't finished or fine tuned yet so third parties won't become fully involved for another year or so.

Oleg certainly would never have released COD in the shape its in if he had final word, but the publisher held the purse strings and had final call. It could be one of the many reasons that Oleg has taken a step back from fronting the development.

That said their is still a very strong possiblility the issues will be resolved, and the new series will live even longer than the original IL-2 series. When the mod tools are released there will be much stronger support from the mod community than IL-2 ever had.
__________________
Intel core I7 950 @ 3.8
Asus PT6 Motherboard
6 gigs OCZ DDR3 1600
Asus GTX580 Direct CU II
60gigSSD with only Windows7 64bit, Hotas Peripherals, and COD running on it
500gig HD Dual Boot
Samsung 32"LG 120hz
MSFF2 Joystick
Cougar Throttle
Saitek Pro Rudder pedals
Voice Activation Controls
Track IR 5 ProClip
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-12-2011, 05:21 AM
Robert's Avatar
Robert Robert is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 717
Default

Are you REALLY going to compare Madoff with Maddox?

You shoulda kept your 50 bucks. Sounds like you need it. And just because Luthier is not on his knees felating you weekly doesn't mean he's not working on a patch.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-12-2011, 05:37 AM
machoo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Who is Madhoff?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-12-2011, 05:43 AM
Feathered_IV's Avatar
Feathered_IV Feathered_IV is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,471
Default

He's a guy who uses the pyramid-scheme method of fraud. Any link to Oleg Maddox is purely through a covenient rhyme in surnames. Anything else is hysterical nonsense.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-12-2011, 06:10 AM
jctrnacty jctrnacty is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 29
Default

I am still hoping that Oleg will return and finish what he begun.

The only problem i see is he relied too much on ubisoft as a publusher instead of this he should release the SOW directly to all sim fans like ED and ROF teams do.

ED split with ubisoft a long time ago and they are doing well.

He could fund the upcoming development with selling flyable aircrafts like ROF do.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-12-2011, 06:23 AM
csThor csThor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: somewhere in Germany
Posts: 1,213
Default

You people have a totally wrong impression of what Oleg was and what he could do. Maddox Games was and is just a very small branch of the juggernaut 1C. 1C is comparable in size with EA, just to give you an idea of the dimensions involved. As such Oleg never had that much say when it came to whom 1C deals with. And he certainly never had the freedom to decide to give Ubi a kick in the hinder and publish things alone - those things were decided by people with a lot more say within 1C. He was certainly asked, but in the end it was not his voice that mattered.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-12-2011, 07:50 AM
JimmyBlonde JimmyBlonde is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 161
Default

Uhhh aren't we forgetting that this game is in its' infancy.

Third-parties don't even know how it works yet so how are they supposed to contribute when even the developers of the software are still struggling to tame it?

Sorry, but I find this thread to be irrational and excessively premature. It's now a fact of life that games develop as they grow older, get used to it and learn to love it because the upshot of this is that we end up with an evolving product which, hopefully, improves rather than a static one that doesn't.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-12-2011, 08:46 AM
Feuerfalke Feuerfalke is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by proton45 View Post
Yea...the "heart" of the community seems to be non existent. If you show any kind of support for the development team, or what Oleg has done...people brand you a "kiss arse", or a "follower", or whatever it is that negative people say.
They did so before. That didn't change.

Difference now is, that you ask yourself, why you should still show your support.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-12-2011, 08:56 AM
Feuerfalke Feuerfalke is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shado View Post
I bet It all went wrong when Ubi got involved...
Are you saying, it went wrong when the original IL2 was produced? UBI got involved in IL2-development over 12 years ago, so that's exactly what you just said.

Well, anyway, I wonder how people can still delude themselves thinking UBI is the big-bad-devilish-dark-evil company wrecking this release, so they can cheer fanatically and celebrate their unholy orgies over loosing a *lot* of money......
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-12-2011, 09:27 AM
HamishUK HamishUK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 65
Default

It amazes me that the blame is apportioned to Ubisoft.

I also get the feeling 1C had a major hand in the reelase too. After all they also need the cash!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.