Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-01-2011, 09:44 PM
Sven Sven is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: The Netherlands, Zeeland
Posts: 787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fruitbat View Post
fact is, majority of BoB was 12llbs spit 1's and hurris with CSP with Spit II's turning up in numbers in sept, v bf109E1's the majority at the start, and E4's by the end, with a smattering of E7's at the end as well.
Yes, fact, so they should all be in this sim. Looking forward to the missing E1 E4 and E7.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-01-2011, 09:55 PM
fruitbat's Avatar
fruitbat fruitbat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S E England
Posts: 1,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VO101_Tom View Post
Please, it would be good if you would grant the source.



How many planes flew - This is the map makers, mission makers' task. What is important for the dev team: existed or did not exist.
Source, Ulrich Steinhilper, Spitfire on my tail.

Steinhilper (he was the no2) and the leader whose name escapes me got to fly them, don't have my copy at the moment, can't remember the others name.

Up until then, they were all on E1's.

also, i've posted this loads of times already, but here we go again,

Quote:
Hooton in Eagle in Flames gives the percentage losses of 109s by subtype:

July
E1 - 44%
E3 - 30%
E4 - 20%

August
E1 - 40%
E3 - 8%
E4 - 52%

September
E1 - 38%
E3 - 1%
E4 - 61%

October
E1 - 36%
E3 - 2%
E4 - 62%

and from Kurfust, over at ubi a while ago,

"I have some actual numbers. On 31 August 1940, fighter units (excluding JG 77) reported 375 E-1s, 125 E-3s, 339 E-4s and 32 E-7s on strength, indicating that most of the E-3s had been already converted to E-4 standard. JG 77 had around 100-125 aircraft with it, but for the rest of the units, its 75% cannon E-3/4/7, the rest are all MG E-1s. The E-1 and E-3 were produced parallel and in about equal numbers from the end of 1938, but by mid-1940, the production of the E-1 stopped, replaced by the E-4 and then the E-7."
Don't disagree at all that it would be nice to see them all though, and let the mission builders build the missions around them.

However, the E7 would be the last on my list in order 'to do', due to the limited numbers it flew in BoB.

I'd still like it though, not as much as an E1 and then an E4 though.

What i don't want, and is what will happen on some severs is them full of spitII's and E7's, as thats not BoB.

First up, it would just be nice to have a proper hurri, spit and 109 of any type performing correctly.....

Last edited by fruitbat; 05-01-2011 at 10:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-01-2011, 10:42 PM
Sven Sven is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: The Netherlands, Zeeland
Posts: 787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fruitbat View Post
First up, it would just be nice to have a proper hurri, spit and 109 of any type performing correctly.....
+ 1 after that we can think about the future
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-01-2011, 10:47 PM
VO101_Tom's Avatar
VO101_Tom VO101_Tom is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 799
Default

Ok. I misunderstood your earlier sentence according to these:
Quote:
Originally Posted by fruitbat View Post
Lol, JG52 got there first 2, read it 2, cannon armed 109's in mid september 1940.
i can get you a quote for that to.
I thought, you say that LW did not use an MG-FF (or /M) earlier at this (sept 1940). They used cannon on E-3, and E-4 too. It is apparent from the list purely that these types flew early.
(I have these databases too, Kurfurst (aka VO101_Isegrim) my squad-mate )

Quote:
Originally Posted by fruitbat View Post
However, the E7 would be the last on my list in order 'to do', due to the limited numbers it flew in BoB.
Why would it be necessary to claim an order? One of the historical facts less important than the other one? At one of the airplanes important the type of the propeller, a whole series does not count at other one?
(only interest, if the numbers count, for what the E-3? Why not E-1 or E-4? Much more were flying from these, than E-3)
__________________
| AFBs of CloD 2[/URL] |www.pumaszallas.hu

i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940
Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-01-2011, 10:49 PM
BRIGGBOY BRIGGBOY is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brigg in Lincolnshire
Posts: 275
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven View Post
+ 1 after that we can think about the future
+1 about having a proper modled hurri, spit and 109 before we start whining about other planes

Last edited by BRIGGBOY; 05-01-2011 at 10:59 PM. Reason: retarded spelling
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-01-2011, 10:56 PM
fruitbat's Avatar
fruitbat fruitbat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S E England
Posts: 1,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VO101_Tom View Post
Ok. I misunderstood your earlier sentence according to these:


I thought, you say that LW did not use an MG-FF (or /M) earlier at this (sept 1940). They used cannon on E-3, and E-4 too. It is apparent from the list purely that these types flew early.
(I have these databases too, Kurfurst (aka VO101_Isegrim) my squad-mate )


Why would it be necessary to claim an order? One of the historical facts less important than the other one? At one of the airplanes important the type of the propeller, a whole series does not count at other one?
(only interest, if the numbers count, for what the E-3? Why not E-1 or E-4? Much more were flying from these, than E-3)
yeah i know there was plenty of cannon armed 109's around from the start, but i also know there was plenty of machine gun ones too, all through the battle

as to an order, it just makes sense to me to do the main players before the bit players, thats all.

But then as i have said many times on these boards, i'm mystified by the choices the devs made on release!

personally, i'd of done the E1 and E4 right form the off, and don't really understand the choice of the E3 instead because of the numbers like you say, but hey, thats just me.

If it had been up to me it would of been, SpitI 12lbs CSP, Hurri 12lbs CSP, Bf109E1, Bf109E4, Bf110C4.

then SpitIIa followed by Bf109E7.

Last edited by fruitbat; 05-01-2011 at 11:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-01-2011, 10:58 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

E-7 would realy make the less sence !
as its fueltank ability was not used during the "typical" BoB time till end of october....
and with bombs its nothing else than a Bf109E-4/B

and a MG-FF/M in game would also be important to give the Bf110C-4&-7 their correct canons !!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-01-2011, 11:05 PM
BRIGGBOY BRIGGBOY is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brigg in Lincolnshire
Posts: 275
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy View Post
E-7 would realy make the less sence !
as its fueltank ability was not used during the "typical" BoB time till end of october....
and with bombs its nothing else than a Bf109E-4/B

and a MG-FF/M in game would also be important to give the Bf110C-4&-7 their correct canons !!
exactly lets get the planes we already have as realistic as possible before adding anymore. after all is this not a sim.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-01-2011, 11:10 PM
ATAG_Dutch ATAG_Dutch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BRIGGBOY View Post
after all is this not a sim.
Huh?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-01-2011, 11:39 PM
CUJO_1970 CUJO_1970 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 20
Default

JG 26 never flew a single mission in BoB with an E3, so if you want to build an accurate JG 26 campaign you can't really do it.

When they arrived in France they did so with the E4 with the MG FF/M cannon, seat and back armor and an armored windshield. They were also equipped with a smaller number of 109E4/N high-altitude aircraft and they did fight with these in the Battle.

Also, enlisted pilots flew some E1 until October.

Overall, it seems E4 was used more than E1 and E3 combined and it is the most common 109 for BoB. So, in order of importance we need:

1. Bf109 E4 with MG FF/M
2. Bf109 E1
3. Bf109 E4/N

It is a real head-scratcher that these aircraft aren't in.

The MG FF/M will also give the 110s an even greater punch.

I sure don't see where an E7 is needed if we speak about BoB only - it can wait 'til later.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.