![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think 1c should have more time to tweack his game before peoples start to mod.That made users made used to new characteristiques and becomes us in betatesters.If game is modded so soon, a lto of work could never be apreciated for players.
Also, too much peoples messing around with the mod, could discourage the 1c team in improving the game. I would encourage any modification that can help or guidge developers in his path. Visual mod are always welcom. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
If, however, the modders all work for themselves and only take those reports and documents for their airplane performance values, then this Sim is dead before it has even taken off. And the worst case scenario would be individuals tweaking their own aircraft to their liking going into regular server ruining it for all others. How are you going to check that? IMHO, the files in question should be protected ASAP, not matter if an unofficial development/mod team takes up the work or not. Cheers
__________________
Cheers |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
But to have modules (and not modifications) we need the SDK ASAP. Who cares about the stock FMs, nobody is so stupid to change those and if he do he would not fly without being banned in a dozen of minutes. Look at the HSFX 5.0 where if you want you can enable those different FMs. At the same time this package is used by so many serious virtual squads that FMs are not being changed to the taste of "one side" but every squad gives its feedbacks. And then all the squad agrees to fly with those FMs during the coop, df server of online campaign; these are guys who fly full difficulty missions. Mods give you the choice to play the game you want and this is the direction that 1C guys have to take ASAP. Team Daidalos is good but remember what happened with the new advanced bomb fusing; dozens of people crying about it (too hard, not totally realistic ect) And they still couldn't fix the 190s. So hacking the code should be denied by 1C but at the same time they should provide the SDK so that people can have "really" fun... (I'll never fly again in a Emil with a turn time of 25secs) If TODAY there are still buyers of IL2 1946 it's because of "illegal" modders.
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well lets hope the next patch now encrypts files and if a file is found modified in any way steam forces its re-downloading in an encrypted state, as on-line play will be ruined without.
As for community “FM” modification, err no there are to many people who blindly believe in published figures and lack common sense. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
So while in principle I am all for modules, as you call them, I am just saying this does not achieve to much as long the individual is able to tweak his planes the way he wants without any restrictions. In that I am not worrying about the jet speed Swordfish, these guys will be banned really quick, I am more worried about subtle changes that give slight edges that could also be explained with good flying, and that at a time when the whole series is too young to have really established itself. I see massive problems coming to the series in this regard. And I repeat, I am aware of yours and Hunin's efforts in IL2 and welcomed them much, so this is not aimed at you guys at all, it's more about a general worry. Getting some sort of official backing here would do lots to calm people worries, especially those that don't know your history.
__________________
Cheers |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Quite frankly the only thing that'll come out of that will be the same as in Il-2 - various groups of people flaming each other like prophets of various religious sects, all of which are absolutely convinced only they have the holy grail of FM/DM/whatever and all others are heretics. Cooperation with the developer yes, and a lot of that please. But getting "the community" to agree on anything? Well, I've got some property on Jupiter to sell to you.
![]() Thanks, I pass ... |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Edit: still we had to wait 10 year for corrected FMs. @Thor: I want to choose my religion, I don't want "their". In this the way everybody is happy.
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 04-12-2011 at 03:42 PM. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I always had hoped that humans can learn from the past .... ![]() |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doesn't STEAM and a Confs.ini entry of VAC=1 force the STEAM check system on ?
|
![]() |
|
|