![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I realize that this is probably a long shot, but it doesn't hurt to ask.
![]() Some time ago I saw mention of night fighters in 4.11 in the DT development update thread. Is there any chance that we could get the F6F5N hellcat night fighter at some point? ![]() ![]() Thanks in advance for your consideration and for the work that DT is doing. Regards, Skyfox Virtual VFN-91 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
that would require a working radar too...
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
its a Grumman , you remember the Grumman story with PF ???
Grumman wants money to allow "their" planes/ships/weapons in the game......................................... and DT might be working for free, they still releasing OFFICIAL patches ! because of that , never !!! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
First of all, working radars are already planned by TD, i think for patch 4.11, so that's out of the way. There's even a youtube video by TD showing an early version at work on a BF110G night fighter.
As for the Grumman thing, i don't know if it applies or not. My understanding was that as long as you don't "sell" models of Grumman aircraft (like they were sold on the PF disk) they can't ask for royalties. DT is making official patches on one hand, on the other one though they are community made and free, so i don't know what the legal interpretation of it is going to be. ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah, a lot of Northrop Grumman planes are disappearing from model kit shelves as well for the same reason.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Maybe i didn't make myself completely clear, so i'll try to explain a bit more. 1st scenario: Do the Grumman royalties refer to products we pay for? As in, if a developer makes a 3d model and "sells" it (in an expansion or other paid-for product), the developer's profits legally "justify" Grumman's royalty fees? If this is true, then do the TD patches get a free pass because they cost nothing, or are they considered part of the original paid-for game because they have an official stamp, thus making them liable to royalty fees? 2nd scenario: Do the royalties apply to any kind of modelling whatsoever, even free 3d models? If this is true, then how come the mods get a free pass? Simply because they can't find a company to sue and can't enforce it? I think it was mentioned at some point that Grumman can sue you for money only if you make money yourself from selling 3d models that are based on their aircraft (the 1st scenario). If this is the case then their lawsuits wouldn't apply to free content, however i don't know if an official patch is considered part of the paid-for original game or not. If it is, then it becomes liable to royalty fees, but if it's not then it shouldn't be. Of course, it could be that nobody knows enough to make a decision. It might be the case that TD might actually be in the clear, but since nobody has the legal knowledge to be sure they naturally just decide to play it safe. Does anyone have more in-depth information as to how this situation actually works? |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
And I found something interesting,althought NOT OFFICIAL about radars.Hope TD watch this video.Can anyone confirm if those stuff are historically correct\ |
![]() |
|
|