Plz help me, I have a question. :)

[lauvhk]

If you really want to tank with your peasant, I would suggest having level 3 pain mirror and turn back time (any level) to make some fun out of it.

[BMiBudster]

Originally Posted by loreangelicus

...or he's just that good that he knows to tank with something better than peasants, like something that could take hits without any casualties at all (cyclops/dragons early in the game), or are easy to resurrect and have high defense (black knights with eviln spell or paladins with resurrect/phantom and their built-in ability). Even at the very early part of the game you could tank with a single griffin (from a griffin egg) or create summons from royal thorns.

Maybe you played KBTL and found out that level 5 units in that game were not up to par with an equal amount of leadership lower level unit types. FYI, they "fixed" the level 5 units in KBAP and are now worth their weight in gold and leadership.

i loled in rl at this clueless post....

firstly if u bothered to check ur facts before choosing to make a fool of urself... u cant have dragons at lvl 5 its not possible gj clueless one...

and cyclopes? ive seen almost the entire game and never came across any unit called cyclopes, i doubt a lvl 5 can see or get them :S

"(black knights with eviln spell or paladins with resurrect/phantom and their built-in ability)" another idiotic comment posted by u....

again he is lvl 5 i highly doubt u can get those at lvl 5....

oh btw "or he's just that good that he knows to tank with something better than peasants" was the stupidest part of ur entire post fyi.

"Even at the very early part of the game you could tank with a single griffin (from a griffin egg) or create summons from royal thorns."

to this stupid comment i say this... a smart player sells the eggs because a) tanking with grifs will only get u so far at lvl 5 and u will eventually lose especially when u have as many inques as the op stated he had....

and royal thorns are not good tanking units most part because at lvl 5 u cant get alot of them.... they dont have alot of movement and i could be wrong about this bit but im almost certain they are ranged attackers....

tanking with ranged what will noobs think of next :S

please be sure to check ur facts before making a fool of urself no offense

oh and btw rezin via paladin is the stupidest way to rez... i mean dont get me wrong if the opportunity arises then ye go for it but ur main rezing should be coming from ur inques and phantoms of inques.

[TemjinGold]

Originally Posted by BMiBudster

i recommend geting these in your army or as backup....knights, paladins, red dragons (when your the right level), green dragons ("), swordsman, gaurdsmen, fire dragonflys (if your doing the smart thing with your pet dragon, which is collecting treasure chests x2 in battles, once you get to the level where you can find 2 chests dont level it anymore)

I never claimed to be good at this game, I just find it interesting that you chose peasants as a tank considering how hard they are to keep alive, which in turn makes it counterproductive to getting the Grand Strategy medal as soon as possible. It never entered my thoughts as I'm playing no-loss impossible, hence the chuckle. I can certainly see how others not doing likewise might find use in peasants for such a role. Freedom to mix and match as you please is one of the great things about this game, after all.

In any case, I'm wondering why the bolded portion is the "smart thing" when a fully leveled Treasure Searcher (2 more levelups from where you are) gets you 3 chests at 8 rage a piece as opposed to 2 chests at 9 rage a piece...

[BMiBudster]

Originally Posted by TemjinGold

I never claimed to be good at this game, I just find it interesting that you chose peasants as a tank considering how hard they are to keep alive, which in turn makes it counterproductive to getting the Grand Strategy medal as soon as possible. It never entered my thoughts as I'm playing no-loss impossible, hence the chuckle. I can certainly see how others not doing likewise might find use in peasants for such a role. Freedom to mix and match as you please is one of the great things about this game, after all.

In any case, I'm wondering why the bolded portion is the "smart thing" when a fully leveled Treasure Searcher (2 more levelups from where you are) gets you 3 chests at 8 rage a piece as opposed to 2 chests at 9 rage a piece...

firstly its 2 chests at 6 rage... not 9, its 9 for 2 chests and 1 alter... and leveling it to 3 chests is not really necessary you dont wanna spend have the battle digging up chests with your dragon...aside from the face your wall, orb and dragon attack will be alot weaker making fights harder...

if you do manage to get 3 chests and win the fight without heavy losses then grats thats impressive especially with the xtra runes and magic crystals you find.

[Petwin]

if you do manage to get 3 chests and win the fight without heavy losses then grats thats impressive especially

No, that's not impressive. Even I can manage that. I play a no-loss game and dig up 3 chests per fight against non-hero stacks. Ususally I'm not that lucky or smart against Hero stacks.

It brings in loads of cash which I don't need because of the no-loss. But it also brings in runes (>10 in 200 fights), wanderer scolls and spell scrolls (I got sacrifice that way, I couldn't believe my eyes!)

[Zechnophobe]

Wow, I think AP just graduated to the next level of internet forum standing. We now have an official troll. Thanks for joining BMI! I mean, what else do you call someone who says things like "It is impressive to get three chests without many losses" who also says that "Peasants are a great early game tank" (Paraphrasing of course).

Next we'll find out he isn't even playing on IMpossible, and doesn't get Grand Strategy 3 until roughly level 15.

[BMiBudster]

Originally Posted by Petwin

No, that's not impressive. Even I can manage that. I play a no-loss game and dig up 3 chests per fight against non-hero stacks. Ususally I'm not that lucky or smart against Hero stacks.

It brings in loads of cash which I don't need because of the no-loss. But it also brings in runes (>10 in 200 fights), wanderer scolls and spell scrolls (I got sacrifice that way, I couldn't believe my eyes!)

"and leveling it to 3 chests is not really necessary" and by leveling it after the initial 2 chests where it becomes 2 chests and 1 alter for 9 rage.. you actually lose chests and end up opening alot less chests... 1) because in a fight you will own in its very hard to get 9 rage x2 before you can win the round

2) you will take losses trying to get 9ragex2 anyone that says they dont take a single loss is lier and should provide proof.

3) trying to open 3 chests at 6 rage as great as that is again you will take heavy losses vsin heros and harder units while you open 3 chests.... again anyone that says they get no losses in talking out their.............

like i said if you actually can get 3 chests and take no losses thats impressive but very doubtful.

btw sacrifice spell is losses incurred and not really a worth it spell to use especially when your trying to get the achievements and trying to win fast and efficiently.