![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It has been mention here that according to history the JU87 B-2 were easy to shoot down yet in the game they are a lot tougher. So you theory does not hold water.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
akuma... how old are you? really.. I want to know
and also, in what world do you live? MW2 yeah? that is quite in BOP's ally isnt it? the flight model isnt screwed up! (the same as the IL-2 pc version!!!), the made another error and FIXED it. you throw your ignorance and ranting in some one elses' face |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The real one And the facts speak for themselves. P51's suck and IL's are massively over spec'd, why is this such a shocking thing to say? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
then we are done with this thread, because that counters all your statements. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Grow up. This is the problem with our country. Too many who think EVERYTHING America does is golden and perfect: I guess if they made a tank sim you'd expect sherman tanks to withstand a few rounds from tiger tanks and be able to take tiger tanks out with one shot? But guess what, the Sherman tank sucked. Many Shermans were destroyed for every Tiger tank destroyed. This is fact - deal with it. The P-51 had great high alt performance and superior range for escort missions - but was not a plane for low-alt turning fights and could not climb with or away from the german or russian planes at low alt. This is fact - deal with it. If you want the P-51 to fly how most casual American historians think it would fly - it would out turn bi-planes, break the sound barrier, and be an arcade game joke. Apparently you need to play HOE. HOE whored itself out for consumption by the ignorant. This is the game you are asking for. Enjoy. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I'm not engineer, but if I put 30+ cannon rounds through an IL-10 wing, its coming off, simple as, but does it in the game, no. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Similar to the Stuka, the IL-2 needs air superiority to survive. There was NO armor at all for the rear gunner on the IL-2, they had horrid casualty rates.
This is why I get so frustrated that the rear gunner is invincible when im shooting it with my BF-109G6. 3 Cannon and 2MG's cant kill a rear gunner with no protection. However, I am able to get under the rear of the IL-2 and waste it with the 109. I do believe it is QUITE A BIT over statted, but there are some ways around it. To be fair, maybe its just me, but I find the B-17 nearly invincible. I have not encountered it mutch yet, but I have 3 kills and 2 deaths against B17 with my 109. I believe the Yaks are a bit over statted as well, but a short burst of BF-109 cannons from a distance will send it down in flames. Really my main complaint about the game is the IL-2 itself. The rear gunner should die from a single decent hit. The Russians apparently did not care about their rear gunners, history backs up this statement. To be fair, I think the P-51 and yes, the Spitfire are two of the most over rated planes in history. I am not disapointed with the P-51 model. I have more complaints and compliments, but over all.....this is the best WW2 flight game on the 360 console. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|