Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > King's Bounty > King's Bounty: Armored Princess > Technical problems and solutions

Technical problems and solutions Armored Princess questions and solutions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-22-2010, 12:26 PM
alpinar alpinar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39
Default

ahh flaw i guess its stands for flaming arow then
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-22-2010, 12:57 PM
dzeris dzeris is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alpinar View Post
ahh flaw i guess its stands for flaming arow then
I don't think that flaming arrow attack is not flawed (I am too lazy to calculate intelect required to do 170 damage). Player can do level 1 flaming arrow attack without wasting mana.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-22-2010, 02:19 PM
mare911's Avatar
mare911 mare911 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Serbia
Posts: 33
Default

I dont know what turn it is, but according to unit placement it should be early in game (1st, maybe 2nd)
because of that, i noticed missing debuffs on enemy units - thorn hunters should have flame DoT from arrow and bears should have 'ZZzzz' debuff because of w8

p.s. i might be wrong, i admit that my last game ended 3weeks ago
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-22-2010, 02:31 PM
dzeris dzeris is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mare911 View Post
I dont know what turn it is, but according to unit placement it should be early in game (1st, maybe 2nd)
because of that, i noticed missing debuffs on enemy units - thorn hunters should have flame DoT from arrow and bears should have 'ZZzzz' debuff because of w8
flaming arrows don't have 100% chance of fire. It is only 20-60% + int.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-23-2010, 08:25 AM
alpinar alpinar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dzeris View Post
he did not cast spell. read spoilers on first and second reply.

yes he did cast a spell..look at the battlelogg ..its even showing the spellbok icon
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-23-2010, 09:37 AM
adoninow adoninow is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alpinar View Post
yes he did cast a spell..look at the battlelogg ..its even showing the spellbok icon
Spellbook icon will be grayed out after a scroll is used.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-23-2010, 09:55 AM
adoninow adoninow is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 11
Default Positive Effects

Quote:
Originally Posted by WhYdOyOuThInKtHaThApPeNeD View Post
There is something wrong with this picture, what is it?
(Maybe there is an explanation I don't understand. But if I'm right, who can spot the flaw? Put your answer in white font. Image is not photo-shopped.)
The priest has two positive effects and should have only one.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-23-2010, 10:08 AM
dzeris dzeris is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alpinar View Post
yes he did cast a spell..look at the battlelogg ..its even showing the spellbok icon
he attacked with flaming arrow spell, but instead of casting spell he used flaming arrow scroll. This can explain why mana is not used. Maybe both ways can be called spell casting, but I could not find other way to say it.

battle log does not show difference between casted spells and used scrolls.

Quote:
Originally Posted by adoninow View Post
positive effects
holly anger gives blessing and holly anger effects. I think blessing is the only reason why it was used. holly anger is useless, because enemy does not have undead or demon stacks.


Nothing wrong with that picture or original poster thinks that something is wrong and doesn't want to reveal it.

Last edited by dzeris; 03-23-2010 at 12:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-23-2010, 10:50 AM
DGDobrev DGDobrev is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Bottrop, Germany, born Varna, Bulgaria.
Posts: 1,415
Default

Exactly. I'm beginning to think we're jumping through somebody's hoops here
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-23-2010, 12:15 PM
travelingoz travelingoz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 245
Default

Makes me wonder why he's taken the screenshot with only the top of the log visible.....
Otherwise there is nothing wrong with the picture as far as i can see!
So how about it then Whydidthathappen... What's your question here???
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.