#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
This is my usual online experience this days. We take three 110's with bombs, warm them up and head for enemy targets. During the mission at least two of us drop out with a game crash. Rinse and repeate. I wouldn't call this a good online game.
__________________
---------------------------------------- Asus Sabertooth Z77 i7 3770k@4.3GHz+ Noctua NH D14 cooler EVGA GTX 780 Superclocked+ACX cooler. 8GB G.Skill ripjaws DDR3-1600 Crucial M4 128GB SSD+Crucial M4 256GB SSD Seagate 750GB HDD CH Fighterstick+CH Pro pedals+Saitek X45 Win7 64bit Last edited by Jaws2002; 01-21-2012 at 08:57 PM. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
some of the best online flight simming I have ever done was in a DCS game.. Only problem with it is there are so few online games and people playing DCS games
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
I'd be happy with a game that purely had 2 fly-ables. E.g. Spit vs bf109/FW190.
The planes would be modeled to the max, with every button, lever, dial and switch working. CEM would be as real as it can possibly get. With COD and IL2 it's nice to fly all those different aircraft but for the majority of the time I fly just 2 types. It would prefer a developer who concentrated getting just two planes right and not spending so much time making other aircraft, which spreads the quality of the aircraft out thinly. In an ideal world the Flight Sim studios would band together to make a unified game engine and then each of them concentrated on making one plane to fly in it. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
The problem with DCS is the way they release aircraft and the completely random choices of aircraft.
You don't fire up people to fly online, when you have a Russian Hellicopter on one side and an American Attack Aircraft. You can't create a good competitive online environment this way. The P-51 is a completely retarded choice as the next DCS plane. There's nothing in their sim at the moment to create a good scenario for that aircraft. Anything more or less modern, would be right at home, with all the stuf already modeled. Now they'll throw in a ww2 aircraft to go with the S300, Tunguska and the A-10. What a logical choice.
__________________
---------------------------------------- Asus Sabertooth Z77 i7 3770k@4.3GHz+ Noctua NH D14 cooler EVGA GTX 780 Superclocked+ACX cooler. 8GB G.Skill ripjaws DDR3-1600 Crucial M4 128GB SSD+Crucial M4 256GB SSD Seagate 750GB HDD CH Fighterstick+CH Pro pedals+Saitek X45 Win7 64bit |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
You could have a whole series of sims like that...
Spit vs 109 P51 vs 190 Spit vs 109 midwar Zero vs hellcat i would pay for a sim that did that...
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers... |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
it wouldn't be unreasonable to guess DCS will produce an axis plane in the future and using the usual online compatability we would get something similar.
__________________
Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Hmmm sounds too much like a dogfight game for my liking, we would need some bombers.
__________________
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL. CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10. INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I mean, if 1c suddenly started producing modern jet fighters instead of adding to the WW2 theatre, I personally would go through the roof. I can only imagine how it must be for the DCS crowd looking for some decent online play.
__________________
Cheers |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Give me I16s, IL2s, IAR80s, Mig3s and Fiats instead.
__________________
Cheers |
|
|