|
Technical problems and solutions Armored Princess questions and solutions |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
ahh flaw i guess its stands for flaming arow then
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I don't think that flaming arrow attack is not flawed (I am too lazy to calculate intelect required to do 170 damage). Player can do level 1 flaming arrow attack without wasting mana.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
I dont know what turn it is, but according to unit placement it should be early in game (1st, maybe 2nd)
because of that, i noticed missing debuffs on enemy units - thorn hunters should have flame DoT from arrow and bears should have 'ZZzzz' debuff because of w8 p.s. i might be wrong, i admit that my last game ended 3weeks ago |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
flaming arrows don't have 100% chance of fire. It is only 20-60% + int.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
yes he did cast a spell..look at the battlelogg ..its even showing the spellbok icon |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Spellbook icon will be grayed out after a scroll is used.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Positive Effects
Quote:
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
battle log does not show difference between casted spells and used scrolls. holly anger gives blessing and holly anger effects. I think blessing is the only reason why it was used. holly anger is useless, because enemy does not have undead or demon stacks. Nothing wrong with that picture or original poster thinks that something is wrong and doesn't want to reveal it. Last edited by dzeris; 03-23-2010 at 12:05 PM. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Exactly. I'm beginning to think we're jumping through somebody's hoops here
__________________
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Makes me wonder why he's taken the screenshot with only the top of the log visible.....
Otherwise there is nothing wrong with the picture as far as i can see! So how about it then Whydidthathappen... What's your question here??? |
|
|