![]() |
#1721
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Note: these examples are all from May 1940.
Here's an example of 12lb boost at low altitude: ![]() here's another: http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...e/bushell.html note here that the pilot is using "full" 12lb boost and he has noted that he was at 5000-6000ft. and another: http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...e/bushell.html again at 5 -6000ft and again with 'full' 12lb boost The idea that that they were using 12lb boost with 87 octane fuel could only be conceived by someone who desperately wants to avoid the truth. Last edited by Seadog; 05-18-2012 at 07:27 PM. |
#1722
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200 Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415 Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org ![]() |
#1723
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[QUOTE=Kurfürst;427304]
and your point is? |
#1724
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#1725
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Present Establishment is what they currently are authorised to have plus they need an additional 200,000 gallons. In the same way the additional guards are an extra establishment. The current guards would be described as the present establishment
If we follow your logic then the RAF in France had no fuel of any description because you are turning all the current fuel (present establishment) into future requirements. Last edited by Glider; 05-18-2012 at 09:17 PM. |
#1726
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200 Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415 Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org ![]() |
#1727
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[QUOTE=Crumpp;427314]Your document says absolutely nothing about fuel "in" France. It talks about requirements and estabilishments.
Why would they require a fuel that they aren't using? Are you now claiming that UK technology was so far in advance of the Germans that RAF fighters could use 12lb boost with 87 octane fuel? We have clear and unequivocal use of 12lb boost over France in May 1940... According to your line of reasoning It's no wonder that Galland begged for a squadron of Spitfires... |
#1728
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We are still waiting for the list of the 16 squadrons that were the only squadrons using 100 octane fuel and 12lb boost in Sept 1940.
We are still waiting for an explanation on how the RAF consumed ~50,000 ton of 100 octane fuel during the BoB, despite the claimed shortage of said fuel. |
#1729
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
[QUOTE=Seadog;427330]
Quote:
I see some people who actually believe galland wanted spits which is just not the case. |
#1730
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No he wasn't, he was sick of those little girlie 109's and wanted a mans aeroplane
![]()
__________________
Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition |
![]() |
|
|