![]() |
#161
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
As for me, I prefer quality and am thus more than happy to purchase the DCS Mustang when it's ready (I'm allergic to betas) and THEN wait for other period content / AC to materialize. And if they don't, well, at least I've got an accurately modelled Mustang in my hangar ![]() YMMV of course, different strokes for different folks... |
#162
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Well so much for the DCS WORLD approach to unification! ![]() I think Ill wait until they enable the FF.. Ah who am I kidding.. Ill start the dl now! ![]()
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#163
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
LOL.. so true!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#164
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, they have 2 aircraft and a helicopter all of which are modeled in excruciating detail. The time it took ED to model just the ka-50 nav system,ABRIS, and the a-10c targeting pod, they could probably crank out dozen of warbirds. No doubt oleg's games are pretty, but the fm is nothing to brag about from what I've been reading over the years.
|
#165
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm curious what doesn't feel right about the FM? I hope you're not comparing it to il2 simple fm.
|
#166
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Until the enable FF it will be hard to say
As simple as it may be, at least there were ways to formally test it PS welcome to the forum newcommer!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#167
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Back on topic
Right in the middle of dl the new beta and the CoD patch posts! This is going to be a busy weekend!! ![]()
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#168
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd love to see what this looks like while strafing rail engines? Does the DCS environment allow steam to be modelled out of the boilers?
Looks impressive but after studying the cockpit, it only looks about as detailed as the modded p-51's of the old IL2 so CloD has room to breath. Maybe in 2017 I'll be able to fly a P-51 in CloD ![]()
__________________
|
#169
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And mine is never likely to be in a computer game!
I still dont get how popular this is, well maybe I do, this is a forum of WW2 aviation enthusiasts, but I dont get ED's philosophy in releasing it for the DCS game world? Good to hear about the DCS third party (ish) Mig 21 though, the Mig 21 could fit in to the DCS world, we had Mig 21's from somewhere excercising up here with our Tornado's not so long ago in real life. |
#170
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, Ace. I love wwII and flew warbirds for years back in the days. I was really looking forward to getting into clod but this patch doesn't really boost confidence. I hate to say this but this beta patch seems like a scam or a stall tactic to me. Anyway, if their next title is the opposite of this debacle then count me in. Also, I'm not really new here. I've been coming here on and off for the past months, but the yellow theme really messed with my mind and I just couldn't bring myself to register.
![]() Quote:
I'm not sure what else you're expecting from a D stang pit, from the pics I've seen it looks right on. ED is owned by The Fighter Collection a company that owns the largest fleet of real warbirds in EU. They rebuild these machine to get them airworthy and fly them at airshows. Clod should have room to breath since it's a dedicated wwII sim which DCS is not. Also, DCS P-51D is in beta. |
![]() |
|
|