Could 6-DoF ever be available in 4.2 if players could forgive small Graphics issues

[JG53Frankyboy]

i would suggest, let TD work.. i belive they are on it

BUT, can you imagine what will happen as soon the MOD packs are avaialble for 4.10.1......... few will care anymore than i guess.

[Bearcat]

Until 4.12...

[EJGr.Ost_Caspar]

4.11

[Bearcat]

Yeah... 4.11... which will be coming out a lot sooner than 4.10 did right?

[Bearcat]

It's funny.. the numbers in this poll mirror the one at UBI pretty closely.. even though only 64 people took that poll. I wonder how many of them posted in this one as well..

Same poll @ UBI

[EJGr.Ost_Caspar]

Originally Posted by Bearcat

Yeah... 4.11... which will be coming out a lot sooner than 4.10 did right?

No, it cannot be sooner than 4.10 - as 4.10 is already out!

Seriously, we care now for shorter delivery times and smaller patches.

[EJGr.Ost_Caspar]

Originally Posted by Bearcat

Same poll @ UBI

Even more funny, I could vote twice there. Seems to be connected to IP, not user.

[klem]

Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar

No, it cannot be sooner than 4.10 - as 4.10 is already out!

Seriously, we care now for shorter delivery times and smaller patches.

Take your time Caspar, that 6DOF will need to be right

[Bearcat]

Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar

No, it cannot be sooner than 4.10 - as 4.10 is already out!

Seriously, we care now for shorter delivery times and smaller patches.

You know what I mean...

That's a good thing...

[Tolwyn]

My "no" vote did have a caveat, and you've hit it.

There is certainly a benefit for a "realistic" 6DOF in the game. To ignore it is exactly throwing the baby out with the bathwater. It would have to be limited (and frankly, I think the "limitations" or, what we call in the business gimbal restrictions would turn a gimmicky thing into a GREAT thing).

My point was that to make it realistic would still not make the majority happy.

Originally Posted by BadAim

I'm not sure that I really want to get into this, but as a fan of 6Dof I suppose I'll risk it......

Isn't the whole argument that 6Dof isn't perfect so it's no good, kinda throwing the baby out with the bathwater? The system in use now is just as wrong, (granted, it was the best we had when Il2 was developed) and 85% of the respondents seem to agree that the 6Dof that is so far available is the better choice.

In the interest of reason I'd be more than happy if DT were to implement a somewhat more restrictive version of 6Dof, but if it isn't practical within the confines of IL2's code (and DT's other constraints) the version that is available now is better than what we've got IMO (and quite a few others).