Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old 03-31-2012, 08:25 AM
Verhängnis Verhängnis is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: I come from a Sea, Up, Over. :)
Posts: 295
Default

Just ignore the ungrateful and slightly mental members here. Evenutally they will die out and everybody will be loving the updates.
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 03-31-2012, 08:31 AM
Rowddy Rowddy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 81
Default

hahaha yeah and slightly is an understatement
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 03-31-2012, 08:41 AM
Ventus Ventus is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
you sir are an ungreatfull little @#%% !!!!!!! if you know better show us what you can then? produce a nice skin or so. this community can do without people like you. At least this kind of attitude says something about your age, but then again that makes me gloomy about the future of mankind.

Woooww, go slowly man!!! I say what i think about the friday update ok!

You are a mega fan about this pics and the game?? ok i'm happy for you, i respect your choice!

All i said in this post is'nt injurious! Take you pills rowddy

Don't be worried about the future of mankind!!! But you can learn about democratic debate on a forum!!!

And unlike you i don't insult you behind "@#%%" caracters!!! and you critic my age......
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 03-31-2012, 08:49 AM
DroopSnoot DroopSnoot is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rowddy View Post
you sir are an ungreatfull little @#%% !!!!!!! if you know better show us what you can then? produce a nice skin or so. this community can do without people like you. At least this kind of attitude says something about your age, but then again that makes me gloomy about the future of mankind.
LMAO so people should be greatfull for a product they will be paying for, money they worked hard to earn Greatfull dont come into it mate, its supply and demand, do you get greatfull on the Colgate website for the toothpaste you buy or the tiolet roll you wipe your butt with?
Next time just show your true colours call him an ingreat cos you want to insult him dont dress it up with pompus superiority because you believe he is younger than you.

Thanks for the update B6, hanging in there for the beta.
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 03-31-2012, 08:53 AM
addman's Avatar
addman addman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vasa, Finland
Posts: 1,593
Default

I love the updates, does that mean one cannot be honest with his opinions? I also thought at first glance it was IL-2 1946 winter landscape but of course it looks a little rough, it's WIP and there's probably a looooong way to go before it's finished, CloD terrain didn't look as fantastic as it does now in the beginning. Some people have short memory. This is not the German Reichstag circa 1942 is it? it's an internet forum...about a game, chillax!

Last edited by addman; 03-31-2012 at 08:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 03-31-2012, 08:59 AM
Eddie80 Eddie80 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 10
Default

I must admit this game had a future but what has been seen the dev, they'll kill him. And stop sucking luthier, take control of ground objects, real simers,
is of no use. Debug the game and after we talk.
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 03-31-2012, 09:17 AM
Insuber Insuber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 1,406
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ventus View Post
sorry for all people here, but when i see this pics first time i said to me : It's il2 1946 screenshots!!! And it's looks like really!! It's not a joke! Sorry for the team dev but i think you can do better!!!
I believe that from a technical point of view your are wrong. If you put side by side that pic and the equivalent from Il2:1946 you will notice a huge amount of improvements, e.g. the more detailed winter terrain textures, the denser and more detailed ground objects, the quality of lighting and shadows not to speak about the detail of models and skins.

One could suspect that you just wanted to throw some of your mud at the developers, on that respect. but I'm sure that you didn't have that idea.

Cheers,
Insuber

Last edited by Insuber; 03-31-2012 at 09:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old 03-31-2012, 09:30 AM
carguy_ carguy_ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: optimist
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ventus View Post
sorry for all people here, but when i see this pics first time i said to me : It's il2 1946 screenshots!!! And it's looks like really!! It's not a joke! Sorry for the team dev but i think you can do better!!!
Do yourself a favor. Play some 1946, do some screens equivalent to this update. Then compare.Or maybe you could show all of us how this is 1946.
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old 03-31-2012, 09:36 AM
Phazon Phazon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 270
Default

Thanks for the update, I imagine it will be fun tankbusting especially considering the level of detail the ground objects have.

I am a little concerned that we still can't see any evidence of anti-aliasing however. This game would look 100x better with an anti-aliasing solution, it doesn't even have to be a complex method. Simply adding an AA method such as FXAA which is incredibly easy to implement (so easy that it has already been done via third-parties) would do wonders to the game and give a real sense of advancement for the graphics engine when the beta graphics patch rolls around.
Reply With Quote
  #140  
Old 03-31-2012, 09:41 AM
Foo'bar Foo'bar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Niedersachsen, Deutschland
Posts: 662
Default

MG is a victim of their own quality. Today we see that 46's quality was far ahead. What they've done is to keep all positive aspects from FB/46 and put more details into it.

That's why today's screenshots look very similar to old ones. But if you'd take a closer look you'll see the difference. And if you'd think twice you'd realize that there's much more work required to make a very good product even better.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.