Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old 03-28-2011, 04:56 AM
kimosabi kimosabi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Svalbard
Posts: 439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Romanator21 View Post
It's a muffled, but still loud, roar with a sort of whooshing sound. So, basically, the sounds aren't far off. Maybe they should be just a little higher-pitch with more piston noise given the engine position.

If you compare to other flight sims, such as the highly praised A2A Spit, the sounds are also similar. (11:00)



Now, the exterior sounds are definitely underwhelming, but I don't think they're final.
That A2A Spit is much more realistic. The Hurricane vid I commented on earlier isn't even in the same ballpark as that A2A Spit. There's even a real life in cockpit clip in there showing how it sounds when he runs up the engine/prop so that you can compare.

Bearcat, have a listen. If you haven't tried RoF yet I can understand you but RoF has loads better engine sounds than what I've seen from released CoD vids. Thursday man, thursday.
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 03-28-2011, 05:52 AM
JG52Uther's Avatar
JG52Uther JG52Uther is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,358
Default

We are starting to see much smoother videos now,so I'm starting to feel a lot happier about things.
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 03-28-2011, 07:02 AM
xnomad xnomad is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 265
Default

Actually the thing I'm disappointed with from these videos is the radio chatter. I was looking forward to an improvement on the IL2 one but this one is worse.

It sounds like a recording studio, like someone in a room and it appears to only use one voice.

I don't know if it's because I speak German but the German one just doesn't sound convincing; it sounds too modern. And the lack of a regional accent makes it sound too clinical.

You know how people sound funny in old movies, and nobody really talks like that anymore, well it's the same with this.

The IL2 ones were better I'd rather have those ones back than this one.
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 03-28-2011, 11:29 AM
pandaa109 pandaa109 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 18
Default

Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 03-28-2011, 02:52 PM
kimosabi kimosabi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Svalbard
Posts: 439
Default

I'm starting to get excited! Thursday! Thursday! lol
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 03-28-2011, 03:15 PM
Strike Strike is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 684
Default



Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 03-28-2011, 07:12 PM
IbnSolmyr IbnSolmyr is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 91
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1.JaVA_Sharp View Post
Isn't there an odd ballistic/damages modelization there ?.. (At 6:30) Maybe it's just that the bullets are dispersed enough, but if not, it looks like the damages aren't perfectly fitting what the tracers show...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Odd ballisticdamages modelization.jpg (235.7 KB, 33 views)

Last edited by IbnSolmyr; 03-28-2011 at 07:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 03-28-2011, 07:28 PM
Richie's Avatar
Richie Richie is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,450
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kalimba View Post
The sound we hear in COD is "supposed" the replicate what a pilot would hear inside a cockpit...A pilot wears a tight helmet with headphones on his hears...
Very different perception than a mic sitting in a cockpit...
I am a sound engineer since 1984 and have done a lot of "foley" recording for movies in the past...To recreate the sound a pilot would actually hear, you have to take those facts in consideration : The helmet would have the same effect as putting your hands over your ears ...So listen to your exemples with high volume on your speakers and put your hands on your ears...That would give you a rough idea...

Salute !
Right. When you sit in a Duster Demon or Dart with a 340 or 360 in it you don't hear what you hear outside the car. Standing behind it at the exhaust tips is a whole different thing. The same goes for aeroplanes...example. Just making a point..Mopar or no car. Sorry had to.





Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 03-28-2011, 08:03 PM
kimosabi kimosabi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Svalbard
Posts: 439
Default

There's one key difference though, Richie, a car don't have unmuffled exhaust headers/stacks sticking out of the hood in front of you. Show me a Hurricane, Spitfire or 109 that have muffled exhaust 2m below and behind your cockpit and you might actually have a point. Throw in some carpets, upholstered seats, headliner, doorpanels and sound insulation in the cockpit while you're at it.
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 03-28-2011, 08:20 PM
Richie's Avatar
Richie Richie is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,450
Default

Ah I think you have me on the Merlins but maybe not the DB because the stacks are practically at your toes. Getting back to the Dart, he has no tail pipes just little turn downs at the mufflers at the differential but you're right they aren't four feet in front of his face. I've got an excellent in cockpit DB 605 recording. There must be a Merlin one around.

Last edited by Richie; 03-28-2011 at 08:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.