Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 10-10-2011, 02:39 PM
Trooper117's Avatar
Trooper117 Trooper117 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zwiebacksaege View Post
and i'm not claiming anything I just wish the devs are working as intense on the game as you cry about critic.
Well, No-one knows how hard the devs are working but I'd guess pretty hard.. their livelihoods depend on their success after all..
I'd like to think they are giving it max in the office..
  #102  
Old 10-10-2011, 02:39 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
The fact is that a patch is usually indicative of progress; improving what is already tangible and playable. In this case, as far as development goes, the team are using this forum as their testing area, and with this in mind, we can't expect progress at any stages. Certainly we can expect to see the game expanded, but whether this expansion is of a high standard is questionable.
Take the landscape colours: Beta 1 was a brilliant step to a fairly accurate representation of England, and Beta 2 is completely reactionary. That is not progress. Is it a patch? The change carries the word patch, but it's not an improvement. And the word patch is usually metaphorical for fixing something.
The lighting has been 'patched', the sounds patched. The cockpits? Well, Beta 1 degraded perfect work, and Beta 2 has pretty much ruined it.

But wait! The word Beta solves everything No, it doesn't. Issues are expected with development, a patch won't always improve the game, a Beta patch even more so, and both may throw up unexpeted problems; but at no stage is it expected that a patch will undo brilliant work. Beta or no beta, the title for that kind of 'destruction' is irrelevent. And my post can be deconstructed as many times by Aces-of-Aces, his work will be irrelevent to the fundamentals of what a Beta is. If we are viewing the Beta as a testing area for changes, then yes, it could be applied here, but is that the case? Has Luthier stated that they are trying out some new colours, and asked us what we think? Has he asked people who actually live in Blighty to post their constructive opinions, or asked the experts among us like fruitbat? No, he hasn't. In this case, this is a change made. For someone who views the change as improvement, it may be viewed as a patch, but as someone who has flown over England many times, as far as terrain colours go this is a major step backwards. Not a patch. And don't even get me started about the cockpits. Is removing the beautiful reflections in the gauges patching the game? God no! Even at beta stage, one would expect a 'patch' to add to the game. Not take away!

Enough from me, just my 2P. We are testing Beta software, and there-in lies why some will post their truthful opinion: to see the game actually improved.
Add one more to the list
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #103  
Old 10-10-2011, 02:42 PM
zwiebacksaege zwiebacksaege is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 32
Default

again i'm not claiming anything as you always want to believe. I just want to give the hint not to be too sure that most of the people who bought this game are satisfied the way it develops. You seem to know that most of them do because of 2 or 3 posts.

so now that you explained the word beta so fine to me... you may also tell me why it wasn't in big letters on my collectors edition?
  #104  
Old 10-10-2011, 02:45 PM
Trooper117's Avatar
Trooper117 Trooper117 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 309
Default

Bingo!
  #105  
Old 10-10-2011, 02:45 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Add one more to the list
Which list is this? I posted my honest opinion to expect mature debate. That comment is childish, and lacks little substance. If you posseseed any analytical skills, it would be clear that I had agreed with your view on the title of Beta, but had refuted the idea that a Beta patch always shows mprovement which negates criticism.
  #106  
Old 10-10-2011, 02:46 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zwiebacksaege View Post
again i'm not claiming anything as you always want to believe.
Implying or claiming.. take your pick

Quote:
Originally Posted by zwiebacksaege View Post
I just want to give the hint not to be too sure that most of the people who bought this game are satisfied the way it develops.
Based on your record thus far.. I can understand why you would want to retreat from your earlier claims to this above

Quote:
Originally Posted by zwiebacksaege View Post
You seem to know that most of them do because of 2 or 3 posts.
Nope

Not based on two post, based on my experience that most (read adults) understand what 'beta' means

Quote:
Originally Posted by zwiebacksaege View Post
so now that you explained the word beta so fine to me... you may also tell me why it wasn't in big letters on my collectors edition?
Looks like you need it explained to you further.. because based on what you just said you still don't get it
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #107  
Old 10-10-2011, 02:51 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
Which list is this? I posted my honest opinion to expect mature debate. That comment is childish, and lacks little substance. If you posseseed any analytical skills, it would be clear that I had agreed with your view on the title of Beta, but had refuted the idea that a Beta patch always shows mprovement which negates criticism.
Philip..

You seem to have me confused with someone that cares about what you have to say..

Know that I don't!

And I haven't for some time now!

I know your still upset with me for how you got set straight wrt trying to lock my posts back in the AAA forums.. But let it go bud! And if you have anything you want to talk about, feel free to PM me instead of posting tangent topics in this thread. S!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #108  
Old 10-10-2011, 02:58 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Mate, I have no personal issues with you at all.
that is completely childish. I don't even post in the modding forums any-more because I haven't played Il-2 1946 for ages.
I'm quite bemused by that, as I always thought you were a fairly mature individual. Tangent topics? I have stayed on topic, and have no wish to appear hypocritical, unlike yourself.
Irrelevent personal issues aside, it is quite clear why you don't wish to challenge my argument; because it quite clearly embodies the idea of a 'Beta' 'patch' in a rather more fluid, eloquent way than what has been posted previously. But it is a debate, and I'm happy for someone to disagree. At the end of the day, it is just my opinion.

So no hard feelings on my part, but I'm sorry that I have upset you.

EDIT-to save further posting, the PM part which I misunderstood was that I have no wish to regurgiate past activities and have personal discussions. I only posted here to have my opinion voiced; I didn't expect personal challenge. Moderator, feel free to delete these irrelevent posts if you wish. Thank you.

Last edited by philip.ed; 10-10-2011 at 03:03 PM.
  #109  
Old 10-10-2011, 02:59 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

So what part of PM me did you not understand?
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #110  
Old 10-10-2011, 03:01 PM
zwiebacksaege zwiebacksaege is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 32
Default

i'm very sorry about having disturbed this wonderful thread. i will keep my dumb feedback to holy beta patches for me in future. very sorry again just to talk about this.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.