Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey

IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-04-2009, 09:43 AM
mondo mondo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 213
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soviet Ace View Post
Most Russian planes later like the Yak-3, Yak-9, La-5, were all more or less more capable than the FWs that they were up against. Basically any German plane you put up against them, they were more likely to win. The Yak-3 could out turn, out roll, and climb better than the FW-190A3 and out roll and turn the other later FWs that it came up against.
Your statement is so utterly blanket and incorrect I don't know where to start.

No Yak 3 ever fought an 190A3. They are not even comparable as they never saw each other in combat. Your comparing an extemely late war aircraft, most of which were build after the war finished against an early war variant which were all but retired by the introduction of the Yak 3.

A3's were getting put up against Lagg3's, Yak1's and 7's (which were all inferior to A3's and 4's they would have met in all but turning circle). A Yak 3 was more likely to meet an A8 or D9 which both could roll with the Yak3 easily and the D9 edges past the Yak3 in quite few different areas of performance, unless your talking about post war varients.

Depending on the subvarient of 190 the roll rate actually got better as versions were introduced. The D9 could easily our roll a Yak 3 through out the speed range, especially as the speed range increased. Then there is diving, the whole Yak series were poor divers due to there weight and power or lack of and in many cases poor build quality.

Just check out the spitfireperformance site for actual performance test results.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-04-2009, 10:47 AM
Buggins Buggins is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mondo View Post
Your statement is so utterly blanket and incorrect I don't know where to start.

No Yak 3 ever fought an 190A3. They are not even comparable as they never saw each other in combat. Your comparing an extemely late war aircraft, most of which were build after the war finished against an early war variant which were all but retired by the introduction of the Yak 3.

A3's were getting put up against Lagg3's, Yak1's and 7's (which were all inferior to A3's and 4's they would have met in all but turning circle). A Yak 3 was more likely to meet an A8 or D9 which both could roll with the Yak3 easily and the D9 edges past the Yak3 in quite few different areas of performance, unless your talking about post war varients.

Depending on the subvarient of 190 the roll rate actually got better as versions were introduced. The D9 could easily our roll a Yak 3 through out the speed range, especially as the speed range increased. Then there is diving, the whole Yak series were poor divers due to there weight and power or lack of and in many cases poor build quality.

Just check out the spitfireperformance site for actual performance test results.
Owned!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-04-2009, 03:02 PM
SirBruce SirBruce is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 36
Default

I really was owned in the second Russian mission, when I heard an Spanish guy speaking (ok, I have the Spanish version). I suppose that he is a veteran from the republican army in Spain that ended fighting in the side of russians in Stalingrad. A good argument if it would have been developed trough the game. Really.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-04-2009, 03:22 PM
Soviet Ace Soviet Ace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Guarding the skies of the Motherland!!
Posts: 1,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mondo View Post
Your statement is so utterly blanket and incorrect I don't know where to start.

No Yak 3 ever fought an 190A3. They are not even comparable as they never saw each other in combat. Your comparing an extemely late war aircraft, most of which were build after the war finished against an early war variant which were all but retired by the introduction of the Yak 3.

A3's were getting put up against Lagg3's, Yak1's and 7's (which were all inferior to A3's and 4's they would have met in all but turning circle). A Yak 3 was more likely to meet an A8 or D9 which both could roll with the Yak3 easily and the D9 edges past the Yak3 in quite few different areas of performance, unless your talking about post war varients.

Depending on the subvarient of 190 the roll rate actually got better as versions were introduced. The D9 could easily our roll a Yak 3 through out the speed range, especially as the speed range increased. Then there is diving, the whole Yak series were poor divers due to there weight and power or lack of and in many cases poor build quality.

Just check out the spitfireperformance site for actual performance test results.
One thing you don't understand, is that the A8 could not roll with a Yak-3. The Yak-3 was primarily and always built for dogfighting, where the FWA8 was used as a fighter/bomber. Now that it was a bomber as well, it takes away the roll rate since it's heavier, and more armored. I used the FWA3 and Yak-3 because both were light and had good roll rates over their counterparts. So in theory, and from what their statistics are, if a Yak-3 were to go up against a FWA3, it could be a pretty fair and even dogfight. Both were lightly armored, and had fast speeds, which in a true dogfight you want in your fighter.

And your statement of Yak-3s going up against D9s is absolutely wrong. No Yak-3 ever flew its maximum height, and no D9 unless the pilot was an idiot flew below or at 5,000-6,000 ft. where the Yak-3 owned the skies. No German fighter could roll with a Yak-3 unless it was like a FWA3 or another early FW.

So until you understand your specs and have read up on the Yak-3, please don't come on my thread and try to tell me what I know to be true. Soviet pilots who flew Yak-3s do not lie.

Understand your Soviet Aircraft, then come on here and have a reasonable chat. Don't come on here and try to be rude. I've been learning about Soviet Aircraft for many many years, and have bought and read many books and memoirs of Soviet pilots and planes.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-04-2009, 03:26 PM
juz1 juz1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: No more team deathmatch, EVER!
Posts: 526
Default

Fight! Fight! Fight!
________
Honda f.c. history

Last edited by juz1; 02-24-2011 at 08:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-04-2009, 03:31 PM
Soviet Ace Soviet Ace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Guarding the skies of the Motherland!!
Posts: 1,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by juz1 View Post
Fight! Fight! Fight!
Please, if you don't have anything to contribute to the thread. Please don't post this spam. Seriously I don't get angry over the net, but I can get irritated.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-04-2009, 03:36 PM
juz1 juz1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: No more team deathmatch, EVER!
Posts: 526
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soviet Ace View Post
Please, if you don't have anything to contribute to the thread. Please don't post this spam. Seriously I don't get angry over the net, but I can get irritated.
easy tiger, I am actually curious as to what you have to say on Russian planes as there's many gaps in western media...

as for "fight,fight,fight" its a chant you'll hear on playgrounds the world over....be cool
________
Detroit automobile company

Last edited by juz1; 02-24-2011 at 08:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-04-2009, 07:40 PM
Soviet Ace Soviet Ace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Guarding the skies of the Motherland!!
Posts: 1,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by juz1 View Post
easy tiger, I am actually curious as to what you have to say on Russian planes as there's many gaps in western media...

as for "fight,fight,fight" its a chant you'll hear on playgrounds the world over....be cool
Don't worry, it was to early in the morning to get irritated. And also, in the last few years, a lot of information has come out on Russian fighters during WW2. I believe, it was a Westerner who asked Yakovlev to make a flyable Yak-3 in the first place.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-23-2009, 03:27 PM
manintrees manintrees is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Squamish, BC Canada
Posts: 112
Default

I love this game!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-04-2009, 08:56 PM
BadByte BadByte is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Norway
Posts: 94
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soviet Ace View Post
FWA8 was used as a fighter/bomber. Now that it was a bomber as well, it takes away the roll rate since it's heavier, and more armored.
Sure your not thinking about the F8?, A8 I belive was pure fighter while F8 was the fighter/bomber.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.