Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-17-2009, 02:56 AM
Loco-S Loco-S is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 15
Default

Over the years I have noted that the altitudes given are relative to the terrain, not indicated altitude, check it out while landing, the altimeter will tell you the altitude over sea level, the "speed bar" will give you the altitude over the terrain.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-17-2009, 02:10 PM
Igo kyu's Avatar
Igo kyu Igo kyu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 703
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loco-S View Post
Over the years I have noted that the altitudes given are relative to the terrain, not indicated altitude, check it out while landing, the altimeter will tell you the altitude over sea level, the "speed bar" will give you the altitude over the terrain.
That isn't true in my experience, I've crashed into the ground with a non-zero height in the speed bar many times, and quite often taken off from a height of 200 (metres I believe), in the speed bar. I don't usually use the altimeter in the cockpit for my height. The heights in the text coming "over the radio" don't match the speed bar. The speed bar, as I understand it, is the three lines of text (height, speed and heading) in the lower left of the screen.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-17-2009, 02:48 PM
C6_Krasno C6_Krasno is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 78
Default

The speedbar gives the alt from sea level, like the altimeter in the plane. When you use the view without cockpit, you have alt from the ground directly under you.
I played quite a lot offline, and it seemed to me that the indications were quite logical, but maybe it changed...
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-17-2009, 08:44 PM
Igo kyu's Avatar
Igo kyu Igo kyu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 703
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C6_Krasno View Post
The speedbar gives the alt from sea level, like the altimeter in the plane. When you use the view without cockpit, you have alt from the ground directly under you.
This is not what I see. I just took a Mossie over the mountains inland of Yalta, paused with maybe 100 metres clearance, certainly no more, and the speed bar height didn't change when I switched from F1 view to F2 view. If this has changed, I don't remember noticing it.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-17-2009, 10:06 PM
C6_Krasno C6_Krasno is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 78
Default

Yes, you're right but I didn't mean that, I was talking about the view with the virtual cockpit (MAJ - F1 by default, IIRC) and a sight.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-17-2009, 11:57 PM
Igo kyu's Avatar
Igo kyu Igo kyu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 703
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C6_Krasno View Post
Yes, you're right but I didn't mean that, I was talking about the view with the virtual cockpit (MAJ - F1 by default, IIRC) and a sight.
I'm not sure about this virtual cockpit business. I thought F1 gave you a cockpit view? or you mean that thing with five dials and no sign of your own plane? I know <shift> (or was it <Ctrl>) <F1> centres your gunsight in planes where it isn't already centred, which the Mossie's wasn't, so I changed into that mode before doing the test.

The heights coming over the radio (maybe only for American and British missions?) are definitely weird, certainly since "1946", maybe since the "Complete Edition", could even have been as early as "Pacific Fighters" at a push. The heights don't match your height from the speedbar, which is metres for me usually, they might sort of match your height in metres converted to feet, but then the numbers in brackets seem to usually match your height in feet taken as a number and converted from metres into feet, even though it should already be feet (i.e. too high by a factor of slightly over three).

It's not a big deal for me, but when people say it isn't happening when I saw it myself, that makes it a matter for concern.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-18-2009, 05:06 AM
adapted.cat adapted.cat is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7
Thumbs up Resolved

I've figured it all out!

First of all, the height in the speedbar and the height in the cockpit are both "above sea level" and not particularly fine-grained, while the height in the wonderwoman/F-35 view is "above ground level" and accurate to the nearest metre.

Secondly, the height you hear over the radio isn't necessarily the height of the waypoint. They only recorded a few voice samples for height readings: 01, 05, 10, 15, 20, and so on. When the announcement comes over the radio, the game takes the waypoint height in 100s of metres, and rounds down to the nearest multiple of 5 (or to 01 if it's less than 500m). But the aircraft ignore that instruction and adjust to fly at the height of the waypoint itself.

I first noticed this when playing a Russian mission just now. There were two flights - one at 2500m and another at 3000m, and I got to hear radio traffic from both and verify their heights by flying abreast of them. It seemed like the radio was giving the right heights for once. Then I went back to the original P-51B mission, but this time I modified the waypoint heights. I've listed, in order, the waypoint height in metres, the radio announced height in metres and feet, and the height we ended up flying at:

Code:
 300m -> 01   (350) ->  350m
 900m -> 05  (1500) ->  910m
1200m -> 10  (3500) -> 1210m
1800m -> 15  (5000) -> 1800m
2400m -> 20  (6500) -> 2400m
5000m -> 50 (16500) -> 5000m
As you can see, the height you fly at is very close (up to the accuracy of the altimeter) to the waypoint height.

A similar thing happens with the heading, but there's one of those for every 30 degrees so you're less likely to notice it. Plus, the heading only makes sense if you're starting from the actual waypoint so if you're off a little the heading will be too and it'll be your fault - not the game's. Taking the nearest reading seems like a good idea and 30 degrees seems accurate enough for our purposes.

I do wish that the game would round to the nearest sample instead of just rounding down all the time - perhaps they can remember that for the next game.

Thanks to all of you for your ideas and comments.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-19-2009, 12:33 AM
Loco-S Loco-S is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 15
Default

Check your reading skills.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loco-S View Post
Over the years I have noted that the altitudes (edit=Wonderwoman view) given are relative to the terrain, not indicated altitude, check it out while landing, the altimeter will tell you the altitude over sea level, the "speed bar" will give you the altitude over the terrain.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Igo kyu View Post
That isn't true in my experience, I've crashed into the ground with a non-zero height in the speed bar many times, and quite often taken off from a height of 200 (metres I believe), in the speed bar. I don't usually use the altimeter in the cockpit for my height. The heights in the text coming "over the radio" don't match the speed bar. The speed bar, as I understand it, is the three lines of text (height, speed and heading) in the lower left of the screen.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-19-2009, 10:57 AM
Igo kyu's Avatar
Igo kyu Igo kyu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 703
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loco-S View Post
Check your reading skills.
As you can see from this thread, I read your post before you edited in the "wonder woman" bit. Without that hint, I took the "no cockpit" view to mean the chase (F2) view. I still read the red bit as saying something I don't see, it may be that changes in the wonder-woman view.

@ adapted.cat I like that post. That does make some sense of what I was seeing, I don't remember what it was that I saw that well but I remember it not being right, and it's interesting that 350 metres is reported on the radio as 350 feet.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.