![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Again... if faced with a decision between types. I'd rather have the one that saw more use across a greater range of dates and scenarios rather than the more obscure one that isn't easily used as a historical type. A Do17 would be cool... don't get my wrong. But a Do217, it's direct successor, would be so much more useful as a flyable aircraft - IMHO. I just see it as a matter of a lot of time invested in doing a project... I'd love for it to be maximally useful. And if we're going by the premise of the OP... then we already have the Ju88 and the He111 representing two excellent early war Luftwaffe bombers. We have a lack of mid and later war bombers available as flyable. Exception being the Ar234.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Please correct me if I'm wrong in this, but won't most German bombers pretty much grounded in 1944 as scarce fuel was allocated to fighters for home defense?
If so it seems like a waste of resources to model late types.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Some Me410s would have been in operation fairly late on as well... but you're right that the priority was for the fighter defenses by that point. But I think by late bombers were talking about types that were fairly active and busy during 1942 and 1943 with some more limited use in 1944 and 1945.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The reconnaissance squadrons in Norway were also using the Ju-88 and Ju-188. They even had a few Ar-234. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
|
![]() |
|
|