Announcement of the game "IL-2 Sturmovik: Battle of Stalingrad"

[bongodriver]

I don't think the core code for IL2 was cracked was it? as far as I can tell only TD who actually have access to the source code can actually write patches, and that sadly is what CoD will need rather than just content.

[Bearcat]

Originally Posted by klem

Good news at the ROF forum

http://forum.il2sturmovik.net/index.php?showtopic=222

Get your facts straight Klem.. That is not the RoF forum. This is the RoF forum: Rise of Flight . The forum you linked is the IL2 Battle of Stalingrad forum.

Originally Posted by ATAG_Bliss

Translation: Ask serious questions or criticisms of the sim and you will be removed. Sounds exactly like the ROF forum.

Wrong. Translation.. see above and below.

Originally Posted by klem

I don't think that's what he means. He doesn't want the constant personal poison flowing as it does here all too often.

Originally Posted by vranac

They will just ban guys which will try to compare Clod and BoS.
But they were honest, no super graphic no CEM, no cockpits , no ground war,
no online wars ...

On your first point.. no only people who keep rehashing the same BS that has been going on here and other paces for far too long. On your second points ... you do not know that.. there is no way you can the devs are still working all that out. I don't really see how any comparisons can be made yet.. do you not see how silly that statement sounds? The BoS forum has nothing to do with CoD that is why questions, complaints,wishlists statements of mourning etc concerning Cliffs Over Dover are not welcome there.. there is no one there who can answer them .. hell the people here couldn't answer them to your satisfaction .. and this is the publisher's forum for crying out loud.

[bongodriver]

I'm sorry bearcat but you had the finger hovering over the ban button for someone simply asking about the capability of the Nature engine, no poison or anything sinister, that sounds pretty close to Bliss's description.

[Bearcat]

Originally Posted by bongodriver

I'm sorry bearcat but you had the finger hovering over the ban button for someone simply asking about the capability of the Nature engine, no poison or anything sinister, that sounds pretty close to Bliss's description.

You sure it was me? I haven't banned anyone yet.. locked a few threads.. but no bans and to tell the truth I'd rather not but you saw the level of vitriol over there that broke down into the whose balls are bigger debate which is not what the forum is there for. If you cannot discuss things in a civil manner then you won't be there.. (not YOU but a general you) I really don't care what "side" you are on. Often things that start out relatively civil can denigrate into a slugfest PDQ and as a moderator I have to take the route that works best for me. The bottom line is that if posters acted like mature adults instead of petulant children in most cases on most forums across the internet things wold run a lot smoother. For some reason sim pilots are a more angst ridden lot even though they generally tend to be older. The rules and guidelines for conduct are listed. If you stay within them there will be no problems.

[bongodriver]

Originally Posted by Bearcat

You sure it was me? I haven't banned anyone yet.. locked a few threads.. but no bans and to tell the truth I'd rather not but you saw the level of vitriol over there that broke down into the whose balls are bigger debate which is not what the forum is there for. If you cannot discuss things in a civil manner then you won't be there.. (not YOU but a general you) I really don't care what "side" you are on. Often things that start out relatively civil can denigrate into a slugfest PDQ and as a moderator I have to take the route that works best for me. The bottom line is that if posters acted like mature adults instead of petulant children in most cases on most forums across the internet things wold run a lot smoother. For some reason sim pilots are a more angst ridden lot even though they generally tend to be older. The rules and guidelines for conduct are listed. If you stay within them there will be no problems.

I didn't say you 'did' ban anyone, you just made it very clear that anything about the Nature engine is not to be questioned or discussed in any manner that is less than an endorsement, good luck stopping the vitriol but I'm affraid you are going to have people asking straight forward questions who will be antagonised by the same people that made this place a hell hole, namely the people that go bat shit crazy if you dare suggest anything might be a bit beter than ROF in some way.

[carguy_]

Originally Posted by bongodriver

I'm sorry bearcat but you had the finger hovering over the ban button for someone simply asking about the capability of the Nature engine, no poison or anything sinister, that sounds pretty close to Bliss's description.

My opinion is that we quickly need a few more mods down there to keep Bearcat at bay. Right now he`s triggerhappy.

Originally Posted by carguy_

My opinion is that we quickly need a few more mods down there to keep Bearcat at bay. Right now he`s triggerhappy.

lol, not at all like how Alpha was here then..... one reported post from you Carguy got you a ban, now have some back you sniveling kid.

[carguy_]

Before you lie again :

yes, I was banned here for like a week for calling someone stupid.

How many times were you banned?

[klem]

Originally Posted by Bearcat

Get your facts straight Klem.. That is not the RoF forum. This is the RoF forum: Rise of Flight . The forum you linked is the IL2 Battle of Stalingrad forum.

.................

You are right of course. I meant the BoS forum.

Interesting possible Freudian slip. In my mind 777 would appear to be the outfit that will control the dev of BoS, hence the mental slipup.

[vranac]

Originally Posted by Bearcat

On your first point.. no only people who keep rehashing the same BS that has been going on here and other paces for far too long. On your second points ... you do not know that.. there is no way you can the devs are still working all that out. I don't really see how any comparisons can be made yet.. do you not see how silly that statement sounds? The BoS forum has nothing to do with CoD that is why questions, complaints,wishlists statements of mourning etc concerning Cliffs Over Dover are not welcome there.. there is no one there who can answer them .. hell the people here couldn't answer them to your satisfaction .. and this is the publisher's forum for crying out loud.

Ok, we will see that.If you'll try to stop critcisam thats bad.

Talk about flight-simming and aviation, foster a feeling of friendship and brotherhood in your hobby. This us vs. them mentality has no place here. BOS will not be a direct sequel to ROF nor will it be CLOD 2.0. Arguments over which sim is better will be closed. Find some other way to communicate to each other in a friendly way.



Jason

Maybe this answers from Loft will tell you something:

15) Do you plan to schedule cockpits at basic models from CloD (spit/hur/109)?

No. This you will not see. The reasons are simple. On the creation of one such car takes a year, sometimes more. The popularity of the genre has to be phenomenal to such expenses were justified. If not be careful, the budget end, and with it the end and projects. So it is not too wise use of resources PC, when applied 20 textures, where only three, and to result in serious performance problems. We hope to find a solution.

http://translate.googleusercontent.c...ef_A#entry3510

Rasim, on 14 Dec 2012 - 22:03, said:

IMHO CloD screens that was posted here today to show how much more realistic lightning of objects is in CloD. I hope till the release graphics will be tweaked and left screen will be closer to the right.

Loft:

Will not be ,removed in the summer and one in the evening, and the second in the winter and in the afternoon. No need to wait no super graphics, if you like the graphics in CloD, fly and have fun, I do not like it much.

Silly,heh

Not to mention other steps back from the standars we already have.