Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old 09-28-2012, 12:48 PM
kristorf's Avatar
kristorf kristorf is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Milton Keynes, England
Posts: 897
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zapatista View Post
that's already been answered by Black6 in this thread


if that rate of progress is to slow for some peoples frayed nerves, then dont keep watching the paint dry, come back every 3 or 4 months to see what further progress has been made and if new patches are out.
Shouldn't that be every 3 or 4 years???
__________________
Regards

Chris



http://www.aircombatgroup.co.uk/index.php





Gigabyte z77-d3h, Intel Core i5-3570K 3.40GHz (OC 4.2GHz), Corsair Vengeance Low Profile 24GB DDR3 PC3-12800C9 1600MHz Dual Channel Kit , Samsung 120GB SSD 840 SATA 6Gb/s Basic, Seagate Barracuda 7200RPM 1TB SATA 6Gb/s 64MB, Cooling Silencer Mk II 750W '80 Plus Silver' PSU,
GTX580 3gb OC
  #122  
Old 09-28-2012, 01:11 PM
Pudfark Pudfark is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 363
Default

@Zapatista

Wishful thinking on your part...at best.
The last 11 months, two weeks, demonstrates different.
No "dev" has ever had direct communication with this forum
and it's members. Between "bug threads" and questions? None.

BS, removed from the project and onto other things, don't count.

Your attempt to find "busy" work for the community to do?
Ain't appreciated. It won't be responded to, by the dev's.
They never have.

The "sell by date" has passed on this venture. They've admitted and demonstrated that fact.

I respect your person and intent.
I just don't agree with it.
S~

@All

I sincerely hope, that somebody somewhere can pull the rabbit out of the hat on this venture. As each day of silence passes? So does patience, understanding and future commitment. S~
  #123  
Old 09-28-2012, 01:32 PM
Pudfark Pudfark is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 363
Default

@Zapatista

Wishful thinking on your part...at best.
The last 11 months, two weeks, demonstrates different.
No "dev" has ever had direct communication with this forum
and it's members. Between "bug threads" and questions? None.

BS, removed from the project and onto other things, don't count.

Your attempt to find "busy" work for the community to do?
Ain't appreciated. It won't be responded to, by the dev's.
They never have.

The "sell by date" has passed on this venture. They've admitted and demonstrated that fact.

I respect your person and intent.
I just don't agree with it.
S~

@All

I sincerely hope, that somebody somewhere can pull the rabbit out of the hat on this venture. As each day of silence passes? So does patience, understanding and future commitment. S~
  #124  
Old 09-28-2012, 01:43 PM
6S.Tamat's Avatar
6S.Tamat 6S.Tamat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 133
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Osprey View Post
I think it's because 777 have stated the limitations of their engine. They (apparently) have limitations with the top speeds and achievable heights of modelling in the atmosphere. A ROF flying mate told me, so don't shoot the messenger. It could be rubbish though, I'm interested to hear the truth though myself.
Funny because all the aircrafts in cod can't reach theirs ceiling, to not talk about clouds and meteo.
On the other side the complexity is growing with the new water simulation that rof is implementing.
After more than a year of "development " in my personal point of view the complexity of the sim is not either a good excuse or the reality. Something badly programmed is cot complex, it is only bad job.
__________________
  #125  
Old 09-28-2012, 02:16 PM
MadTommy MadTommy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 493
Default

For some reason this whole customer relationship reminds me of this sketch.



Watch it all... every bit is relevant, especially the end

  #126  
Old 09-28-2012, 04:45 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

So much for the 'theory' that 1C took the money and ran or that Luither does not care let alone post here anymore and that 1C customer relations are for not

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=34617
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #127  
Old 09-28-2012, 04:55 PM
MadTommy MadTommy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
So much for the 'theory' that 1C took the money and ran or that Luither does not care let alone post here anymore and that 1C customer relations are for not

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=34617
Oh everything is just perfect now.. how silly of us all. You are right and 90% of the community where talking crap as usual.

Lets see how things progress before you bath in your own self appointed smugness eh.
  #128  
Old 09-28-2012, 05:09 PM
Force10 Force10 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
So much for the 'theory' that 1C took the money and ran or that Luither does not care let alone post here anymore and that 1C customer relations are for not

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=34617
LOL! I almost feel sorry for Ace, he thinks that when luthier pops his head in once every 6 months for a patch announcement that equals "good customer relations". It's sad really.
  #129  
Old 09-28-2012, 05:31 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

LOL You hard core types are too funny..

To the rest of you reading this post.. Note how they have to twist the words around and flat out make things up to justify thier positions..

For example.. Where did anyone say things are perfect now? Another example, a simple search of Luithers post will show that he has posted here several times in the last six months.. Not to mention Luither has had BS pass along his posts for severl months now

Talk about feeling sorry for someone..

Someone who has to lie to keep the lies alive!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #130  
Old 09-28-2012, 05:43 PM
Storm of When Storm of When is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 93
Default

C U next Tuesday mate.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.