Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-12-2012, 10:48 AM
NZtyphoon NZtyphoon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NZ
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robo. View Post
Quote from 'Spitfire on my tail' by U. Steinhilper, a Bf 109 pilot who has been shot down on 27.10.1940
A question, and waaay OT - just how often did German pilots yell "Achtung Spitfire!!!" and did they ever yell "Spitfire!!" - I have long taken this to be an urban myth peddled by old British comics (a few years ago I flipped through an olde collection of Victor and Commando comics - every time a German pilot got bounced he yelled "ACHTUNG, SCHPITFUERER!!" or a variation thereof, then "AAARGH!!" as their 109 or 190 was torn apart...)

Did German pilots and aircrew actually use the British "Spitfire", or were they more likely to use the German equivalent Hitzkopf or Feuerkopf?. Just a question and pardon my ignorance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-12-2012, 11:26 AM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
It's not just about maniaining the optimap pitch and engine RPM...
It is all about maintaining optimum pitch and rpm.

As you coarsen the pitch to reacquire the rpm, you will notice an increase in performance.

In the quoted cases, they are setting the engine to a limited over boost and coarsening the pitch to maintain rpm.

That is how it works.

The experienced pilots you are quoting are coarsening pitch before rpm drops. If you know the approximate performance for a given setting, then coarsening the pitch at rpm will cause an increase in performance within limits.
It will also cause a subsequent manifold pressure drop and the performance will suffer as a result if outside of a narrow range.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-12-2012, 12:22 PM
kohmelo kohmelo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 19
Default

How am i getting the feeling about those quotes that they "kick the clutch" to acquire better rpm powerband?

Like with those insane 80s turbocharged cars they used clutch slip to keep engine at better rpm (in the narrow maxpower area). Even without charger it would give technically short boost --> In car you kick the clutch for so long that you can rise RPM to best rpm usually the power from engine and momentun in driveshafts makes your car "burn rubber," or go "slowly sideways"

Technically would it be the same thing with prop pitch? "feather" prop to add rpm and then kick in the more coarser? pitch to force that engine power and momentum to movement for that narrow timeline.
I really don't think that pitch would change fast enough for that have any kind off use.

As for milling pitch up down in narrow area there might be some advantages if doing this at point where engine starts to lose RPM.

Well working or not i'll might test this for my own amusement.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-12-2012, 02:39 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
"feather" prop to add rpm
You would not feather the prop to add rpm. Feathering is where you coarsen the blade pitch to the point the chord is parallel to the relative wind.

A feathered propeller produces no thrust at all and minimal drag. It would be very poor practice to run the engine with a feathered propeller and the engine is shut down when the propeller is feathered.

It is done to keep the shut down engine propeller from windmilling and causing loss of control.



You are right about the Bf-109 pilots doing the aerial equivilent of "popping the clutch". That is exactly what they are doing so to speak. It is an advantage of a controllable pitch propeller. It is something that would take experience to do. The pilot must understand the principles of propeller operation regarding pitch and the relationship of manifold pressure and rpm.
__________________

Last edited by Crumpp; 09-12-2012 at 02:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-12-2012, 04:22 PM
kohmelo kohmelo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
You would not feather the prop to add rpm. Feathering is where you coarsen the blade pitch to the point the chord is parallel to the relative wind.
Sorry about that, I really do did'nt know the exact terms in english. So term would be quite opposite what i meant.
Still you did understand what i meant. Great!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-12-2012, 04:46 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
Still you did understand what i meant. Great!
I knew exactly what you meant! You expressed it well.

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-13-2012, 06:14 AM
Robo.'s Avatar
Robo. Robo. is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
It is all about maintaining optimum pitch and rpm.

As you coarsen the pitch to reacquire the rpm, you will notice an increase in performance.

That is how it works.
I understand how it works, no need for bold writing mate. My point was that it's not all about setting your engine for certain (optimal) rpm and keeping it that way - but especially at the altitudes, you would need to work with it constantly to get more speed. This is all relevant to the thread title which is about supercharger and rpm in 109s.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
In the quoted cases, they are setting the engine to a limited over boost and coarsening the pitch to maintain rpm.
To mainatin speed / performance. Not rpm... it's all explained in detail in the above quote...
__________________
Bobika.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-13-2012, 11:07 AM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Geez robo,

Quit being dense on this, I have explained how it works. What I am saying is what the pilots are doing.

Quote:
that it's not all about setting your engine for certain (optimal) rpm and keeping it that way
Your point is wrong.

Quote:
To mainatin speed / performance.
Right...by maintain rpm!!!!!

If you lived close by, I would take you and show you how it all works. My plane has a very accurate Engine Monitoring System.

Manifold pressure, rpm, and mixture are all interelated to produce a given performance.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-13-2012, 04:02 PM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

Steinhilper explains how he's constantly changing pitch and rpm to improve speed performance. It would be interesting to know if the perceived increase in speed was placebo or not, but that doesn't change the method.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-13-2012, 04:30 PM
Robo.'s Avatar
Robo. Robo. is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
Geez robo,

Quit being dense on this, I have explained how it works. What I am saying is what the pilots are doing.
Thank you, I appreciate how you're trying prove you're right at all times, especially when you happen to be wrong.

Again - 'to maintain rpm' in my book means keeping it constant. That is possible and desirable for optimal performance of a 109 (even in CloD), but it is clearly not the case with the practice described in Steinhilper's quote, he was actually changing (changing is the word here) rpm up and down to maintain his speed = he would be slower without doing that = he would be in more danger with all those Spitfires around. I thought that quote would be interesting for virtual pilots in here and it is on topic with this thread (especially for supercharger part), but you obviously assumed that I don't know how things work because it is soo complicated. I am so glad to have you on this forums so thank you again for your kind offer.
__________________
Bobika.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.