Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: Do you use or intend to use DirectX 9?
No I do not and I don`t think it should be supported at this stage anymore 254 90.07%
Yes I do and will do so in the future 28 9.93%
Voters: 282. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 06-23-2012, 10:05 PM
major_setback's Avatar
major_setback major_setback is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lund Sweden
Posts: 1,415
Default

As B6 stated, the majority of Eastern/Russian federation countries use it, so it has to be be supported (because unauthenticated versions of Dx10 operating systems don't exist).

Poll options are biased towards only one opinion.

I very much agree that it should be supported though it will not affect me personally. There is no poll option that suits this position.
__________________
All CoD screenshots here:
http://s58.photobucket.com/albums/g260/restranger/

__________


Flying online as Setback.
  #82  
Old 06-24-2012, 03:08 PM
MBF MBF is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 28
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redroach View Post
Stop it! Stop it! STOP IT! DX9 is supported on the CoD box -> CoD stays supported until at least the next (first? last? never-coming?) addon. Simple as that. Call it "contractual obligation" if you want to.
This.
  #83  
Old 06-25-2012, 03:49 AM
Codex Codex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hoppers Crossing, Vic, Australia
Posts: 624
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdog_kt View Post
On a final note, remember our precious, shiny effects that we love so much and everybody was upset and accusing the devs of cutting features to artificially improve performance in the alpha patch when they went missing? They are coded entirely in DX9. So, if anyone wants to wait another couple months for the team to do all the effects from scratch on DX10 only, be my guest and support the exclusion of DX9.

...

No DX9 = patch takes longer. It's really that simple
That just comes down to poor design of the graphics engine ... but then who am I to judge
  #84  
Old 06-25-2012, 03:55 AM
FS~Phat FS~Phat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 609
Default

This has run its course and been flogged to death and is just festering away.

The DX9 support still exists in the current official patch and is intended to be added again in another beta patch when the devs are ready.

They have heard you.

Thread Closed, enough said.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.