Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-22-2012, 02:32 PM
Talisman Talisman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 74
Default LW aircraft speed specifications

http://lend-lease.airforce.ru/englis...ikov/part3.htm

The above is a link to an interesting article named

Conversations with N. G. Golodnikov

Part Three. P-39 Airacobra and Yaks

Towards the end of the conversation there is talk about the book specification speed of LW fighters, which I do not fully understand. I am no expert, but should we take the book speed of LW fighters with a pinch of salt as a result of this information?

A. S. Nikolay Gerasimovich, if you look at any reference book, the superiority in speed of German aircraft—the Bf-109G and FW-190—is indisputable. Minimum 20—25 kilometers at low altitudes and up to 80—100 kilometers at high altitudes. And you say ours did not lag behind?

N. G. No, some difference in speed always exists. At low altitudes we were a bit faster, at high altitudes they were. The difference was on the order of 10—20 km. But this difference was not so great that it ensured overwhelming superiority. In combat it was practically not discernible.

A. S. Nikolay Gerasimovich, sometime relatively long ago I was speaking with a pilot—a frontline veteran. Right after the war they flew in captured aircraft. And no matter how hard they tried, they were unable to attain the speeds the Germans had written in their specifications. The shortfall in speed was significant. In the end, they prevailed upon a German, a high-level specialist, and asked him, “Why this shortfall in speed? Are we using the engine’s capability incorrectly?” His response was that they would never achieve the target speed, because the German specifications showed the theoretical speed, and they were attempting to attain that speed on their instruments.

Nikolay Gerasimovich, in your view, is this possible?

N. G. Of course. We had a group of specialists with us from NII VVS. They were examining specifications and were looking at speed. “What speed is indicated at 7,000 meters? 780? Take away 100. And what about 3,000 meters? 700? Reduce it 70 km.” This is how they calculated the instrumented speed and, characteristically, almost always hit their target. Perhaps they knew something about our focus on speed.

Text © AndreySukhorukov
Translation © James F. Gebhardt
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-22-2012, 03:51 PM
zipper
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

... the difference between true and indicated?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-22-2012, 05:33 PM
csThor csThor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: somewhere in Germany
Posts: 1,213
Default

[Tongue-in-cheek] Don't worry. Soviet frontline pilots also never got the performance their aviation industry promised. [/Tongue-in-cheek]

Seriously: One interview done decades after the war is neither indicative of any trend or fact not an authority on anything but a veteran's personal recollections. It's just a tiny part of a very long and very complicated equation.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-22-2012, 06:50 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
... the difference between true and indicated?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-23-2012, 01:58 AM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talisman View Post
A. S. Nikolay Gerasimovich, sometime relatively long ago I was speaking with a pilot—a frontline veteran. Right after the war they flew in captured aircraft. And no matter how hard they tried, they were unable to attain the speeds the Germans had written in their specifications. The shortfall in speed was significant. In the end, they prevailed upon a German, a high-level specialist, and asked him, “Why this shortfall in speed? Are we using the engine’s capability incorrectly?” His response was that they would never achieve the target speed, because the German specifications showed the theoretical speed, and they were attempting to attain that speed on their instruments.
Not supirsed at all
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-23-2012, 07:46 AM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

This is so unspecified that it is absolutely worthless besides the anecdotical value.

What german fighters in which version and what equipment? No Information.

Were they trying to reach the 190 A8 speeds with a F8 or so?

And then hearsay from a german specialist, who might say anything to please his new masters.

Worthless for any real value deductions, i'd say.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-23-2012, 08:27 AM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zipper View Post
... the difference between true and indicated?
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-23-2012, 10:06 AM
Flanker35M Flanker35M is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,806
Default

S!

I wonder why AoA took it as a "truth" when certain criteria was met For me that interview was nothing but an interesting study of viewsets, nothing more.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-23-2012, 01:04 PM
Osprey's Avatar
Osprey Osprey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Posts: 1,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robtek View Post
This is so unspecified that it is absolutely worthless besides the anecdotical value.

What german fighters in which version and what equipment? No Information.

Were they trying to reach the 190 A8 speeds with a F8 or so?

And then hearsay from a german specialist, who might say anything to please his new masters.

Worthless for any real value deductions, i'd say.

I think you need to prove that.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-23-2012, 01:27 PM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Well TsaGi actually measured their Bf 109G-2 a bit faster than the German 'official' specs...
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.