Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-10-2012, 06:45 PM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Schlageter View Post
We will see if Kurfy can come up with such proofs when it comes time to model the 1.98ata Bf109K-4.

Not very likely.
Just don't get banned again when it happens again, Milo Morai, luftluuver, billythekid,, KrazyKanuk, Al Schlageter or whatever else name you were using until you were permabanned for calling Oleg Maddox an imbecile when he choose to model it.

Until that, you can still read of 1.98ata 109Ks here: http://www.kurfurst.org/Engine/Boost...arance198.html
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org
  #2  
Old 05-10-2012, 08:19 PM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

Ah poor Barbi, telling lies again. Got proof?

Glad you posted that link Barbi. Here is an excerpt:

Quote:
This notes in relation of I./JG 27, III./JG 27, III./JG 53, IV./JG 53 to increase the maximum boost pressures to 1,98 ata manifold pressure.

It is not known if and how many units had converted to 1,98 ata manifold before that order came, but it should be noted these units, in particular III./JG 27, III./JG 53 and IV./JG 53 were the major users of the Bf 109 K-4 in the Lufwaffe. The other units effected are not known at present, but given the abundance of photograph depicting G-10 and K-4 fighters belonging to other units, marked for C-3 fuel use - a likely sign of the DC engine at 1,98 ata - the boost increase was likely not limited to JG 27 and JG 53 alone.
All will notice that there is no official documentation, just someones text. This in contrast to the reams of documentation you want provided on 100 octane fuel during the BoB.

Also notice that it is for an boost increase, not that it was done. Yet, how many reams of documentation have to be provided for 12lb boost.

Next, you do PURE SPECULATION on the numbers so modified as C3 fuel was also used in other DB605 engines besides the DB605D.

Then there is the question when the time comes if Crumpp will back up your PURE SPECULATION.
  #3  
Old 05-10-2012, 08:35 PM
NZtyphoon NZtyphoon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NZ
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst View Post
Just don't get banned again when it happens again, Milo Morai, luftluuver, billythekid,, KrazyKanuk, Al Schlageter or whatever else name you were using until you were permabanned for calling Oleg Maddox an imbecile when he choose to model it.

Until that, you can still read of 1.98ata 109Ks here: http://www.kurfurst.org/Engine/Boost...arance198.html
Says the professional Kurfurst Or Barbi or Adam whatever who knows all about being banned ; (for some reason someone who claims to have very little interest in the RAF is still obsessed with 100 Octane fuel and presents the same "evidence" to "prove" his "case"...)
or blocked 10 times from Wikipedia and whining about it, because its all a plot to discredit poor Kurfurst before, finally, being blocked indefinitely but its all a plot and whining about it; and as a sockpuppet blocked (this is the same Kurfurst who falsely accused another editor of being a sockpuppet)

Last edited by NZtyphoon; 05-10-2012 at 08:38 PM.
  #4  
Old 05-10-2012, 08:43 PM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

NZt, I don't think Barbi would want it known why he got banned from Aces High.
  #5  
Old 05-10-2012, 09:15 PM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by NZtyphoon View Post
Says the professional Kurfurst Or Barbi or Adam whatever who knows all about being banned ; (for some reason someone who claims to have very little interest in the RAF is still obsessed with 100 Octane fuel and presents the same "evidence" to "prove" his "case"...)
or blocked 10 times from Wikipedia and whining about it, because its all a plot to discredit poor Kurfurst before, finally, being blocked indefinitely but its all a plot and whining about it; and as a sockpuppet blocked (this is the same Kurfurst who falsely accused another editor of being a sockpuppet)
Oh, Minortroll goes on to his daily routine, the petty waste of his days. 'twas, for some time, of some entertainment value, but as with most shows and people with little substance in them, the novelty wore off pretty quickly and it's now just the boring routine - another nolifer kid who has got his buttocks handed to him a few times, and having no purpose for himself, now found that in a lifetime revenge campaign. On the internet.

I wondering though, how uneventful your life may possibly be, spending it like this. I guess you should marry luftie, he spent the last ten or twelfe year of life doing the same until nobody really gave a flying ack-ack about him. I sense you are just from the same material. Well, I guess it's time to wish you a lot of good fun.
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org
  #6  
Old 05-11-2012, 04:34 AM
NZtyphoon NZtyphoon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NZ
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst View Post
Oh, Minortroll goes on to his daily routine, the petty waste of his days. 'twas, for some time, of some entertainment value, but as with most shows and people with little substance in them, the novelty wore off pretty quickly and it's now just the boring routine - another nolifer kid who has got his buttocks handed to him a few times, and having no purpose for himself, now found that in a lifetime revenge campaign. On the internet.

I wondering though, how uneventful your life may possibly be, spending it like this. I guess you should marry luftie, he spent the last ten or twelfe year of life doing the same until nobody really gave a flying ack-ack about him. I sense you are just from the same material. Well, I guess it's time to wish you a lot of good fun.
Talking about yourself again; sad, sad, sad vindictive Barbi.

Last edited by NZtyphoon; 05-11-2012 at 04:36 AM.
  #7  
Old 05-11-2012, 06:35 AM
41Sqn_Banks 41Sqn_Banks is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 644
Default

Is it possible that someone can post the available papers from the Co-ordination of Oil Policy Committee meetings?
  #8  
Old 05-11-2012, 08:27 AM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Banks View Post
Is it possible that someone can post the available papers from the Co-ordination of Oil Policy Committee meetings?
I have asked David (Glider) a couple of times to post the papers, but he is appearantly not so willing to publicly anything else than the crops he has posted so far.

I can post you those if you want.
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org
  #9  
Old 05-11-2012, 08:41 AM
41Sqn_Banks 41Sqn_Banks is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 644
Default

Would indeed be nice to have all papers collected in one post.

I've only seen parts of 5th and 6th meeting, but it's not clear what "units concerned" means in the context. Does it mean the stations that should store only 100 octane (i.e. the Blenheim squadrons), or does it mean the stations that should receive 100 octane and keep one tank 87 octane? Are these all fighter stations with Hurricane and Spitfire or only some selected stations? The 5th meeting only specifies those stations with 100 octane only, but doesn't contain a list of the others. Maybe this list is in one of the earlier meetings.

Also we always see only the "summary" and I would expect that other pages describe the situation in more detail.

I have the feeling that the answer is within this papers.

Last edited by 41Sqn_Banks; 05-11-2012 at 08:46 AM.
  #10  
Old 05-11-2012, 01:53 PM
Glider Glider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 441
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst View Post
I have asked David (Glider) a couple of times to post the papers, but he is appearantly not so willing to publicly anything else than the crops he has posted so far.

I can post you those if you want.
For the record 'those crops' as Kurfurst so describes the paper are the only part of those meetings that dealt with the purchase, storage and distribution of 100 Octane fuel and Kurfurst is aware of this. It isn't a case of being unwilling, its a case of there is nothing more of relavence.

He expesses doubt but has had ample time to obtain copies himself to prove it one way or the other.

I am pleased that he has finally posted the papers available which show the trail in context rather that emphasising one paper.

Last edited by Glider; 05-11-2012 at 01:56 PM.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.