![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Kwiatek, the charts you present are accurate, I'm sure, and are on public record. After today's admissions, I honestly do not believe accuracy is desired nor sought after in this game. It's a shame, but I believe that to be the reality.
__________________
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Calm down ... did anyone compare the above charts with B6 ones? I don't think so. And btw, not a word about the fact that today the Hurricane is grossly overmodeled and requires a serious correction?
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
umm yes they did, thats the problem, and no one here is denying the hurri is over modelled at the moment.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Then those who did the comparison, could possibly put their data on a graph, as B6 did? I did some random checks of the Hurricane I curves and I found interesting things. BTW what's the source of the Kwiatek speed/alt charts for Hurricanes ? And why they tell different figures? Last edited by Insuber; 04-24-2012 at 06:35 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well, Insuber, I can tell you I'm deadly calm. It's 1C that claims the Hurricane Rotol is overmodelled -- and you're saying it's grossly overmodelled. I don't believe it is. What I DO know is that the Red fliers have been dealt an unfair hand for a year but waited patiently for 1C to get things sorted out with the graphic coding problems. We did NOT expect further unfairness to be meted out in terms of RAF flight modelling. We haven't been as vocal about it this past year as apparently we should have been.
Charts? Charts haven't done any of the RAF fighters in this game much good, have they?
__________________
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It has never been about fair or historical!!! 1c has always gutted,FM when it came to allied planes--- just look at 46 fb ace ex pac pf. the russian an german planes always out climb out fly out turn out run. I can go on an on, But whats the point !!! they will always make the game this way,simply becouse they can't take a allied plane being better ,p51 p38 etc etc the list just keeps getting bigger!!! they might as well put jet packs on their planes to start with,even after hard evidence gets to them with real info.they ignore!! As the years go by,waiting for this new patch, Here is something to chew on, most people that buy this game an your others are mostly 30 to 60 years old!! showing me how your sequal is before you have this game fixed ,is not the smartest thing to do!!! shows your balls though!! but i will never buy your next game or anything else you put out till this game is fixed,!!! P.S. THIS POST WILL PROB. BE DELETED AS A NEY SAYER AGAINT THEIR BROKEN GAME , BUT KEEP SHOWING ME YOUR NEXT GAME TO RUB SALT IN THE WOUND THAT JUST KEEPS GETTING BIGGER!!! there use to be 3 number 1 lies no.1 I sent it out last week . no.2 the checks in the mail, no.3 i promise i won't cum in your mouth , and now you have given this group a new 1 . patch any day now lmao
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
just what will keep the 109s from diving to deck with tail between their legs and make a run for it every time a non rookie Spit's on their six?? they do that already!!! with even slower Spits on deck, might as well open them a freeway...
now that the Spits IIa are getting less power, either they make an appearance as a fair choice on all servers, or i'd be guessing what blues would be afraid about; it's very easy to have solutions with the best performing plane, even when they come down to the famous run away most times.. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
@BlackSix: Why does the Spitfire Mark IIa fly so differently offline vs online? Per my findings on #6 post at http://theairtacticalassaultgroup.co...2238#post12238
__________________
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I have to think that if a dev can't be bothered checking into the forum of one of the busiest Cliffs of Dover servers.....then they'll hardly be bothered looking at a chart.... ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
|
|