![]() |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For those who are not signed up for the DCS news letter, I pasted a few notes here that may interest those P-51 fans
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Very tempting to get the P-51, I got both Black SHark and A-10.
The problem as I see it is I mainly fligh online nowadays. It would be a very sterile experience without contempoaries to shoot down. You mentioned that they are using their sim engine as a core and will now be building their planes and expansions around it. Even opening it up to 3rd parties. Hopefully once the BoB team sort out the issues with the graphics engine they will be able to do the same, exciting days, months and years ahead! I Wish both teams well with their development. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I stil have NO IDEA what they are thinking in the main office at DCS. They combined Black Shark and A-10............ I am not sure what business those 2 aircraft have being in the same AO. I mean yeah they both blow stuff up, but you cant dog fight, you cant fly formation, you cant really do anything together. Its like mixing a tuxedo, with swim trunks, yeah they are both clothes, but your not going to wear them together.
This whole idea of P-51, seem hap hazzard, with no real purpose other than "Ooh wow a P-51!!" Thats neat and all but with out anythign on the other side. The "WOW" factor is going to wear off quick. The A-10 was built for CAS, the P-51 was built for long range A to A/bomber escort. Thats why these just dont mix. But here is to hoping they arent just realeasing random arcraft willy nilly. and give us a 109 or 190 to go after. If DCS put a little effort in they would have 1C chasing its tail. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great news on being open to 3rd parties. I hope 3rd party MSFS stuff will be converted to DCS one day.
Il-2 series was started with only one plane in mind (Il-2) ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agreed. I'd love to see some Accusim A2A ww2 planes be made for DCS series with planes with actual damage model and weapons.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
S!
The creativity and power of a dedicated community should never be underestimated if given tools like this on DCS ![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes 3rd party is good BUT there needs to be some type of QC like the way the old IL-2 series had. Modeler makes model and then sends it to 1cMG, they "QC" it and approves it. There's nothing more I hate then flying a plane with a really nice looking 3d model exterior with a crud looking cockpit or vice versa. It completely destroys any consistency and that's why I don't like many of the mod planes for old IL-2, sure I'd love to fly some of them but not with those crummy looking 3d models/cockpits. I assume and I hope this system will be in the future IL-2 series because quite frankly, without 3rd party and with regards to how long it takes to make one plane for the new IL-2 series, we are looking at a desert of extra content.
It's been over a year since release now, how many new (and I don't mean variants of existing models) flyable planes do we have in CloD? that's right, not many. I've said it before, I'm willing to pay for content if they would just make it, waiting a couple of years for new content in expansions is not gonna cut it.
__________________
|
![]() |
|
|