Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #331  
Old 03-30-2012, 07:12 PM
Falstaff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

David Harward said:

>>How would you summarize what you have achieved in here? <<

Not much, but I have called you on your awful malicious manner, and that is good enough for me.

Anything else, such as pointing out Chivas' complete and utter works of fiction (i.e. pretending to know what is going on inside the dev house, and general Yoda-ness) is a bonus before the ban takes place.

And then you can prcatise nastiness against others not so adept at responding. But with me, you'll get nowhere.

Ben

Last edited by Falstaff; 03-30-2012 at 07:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #332  
Old 03-30-2012, 07:17 PM
taildraggernut taildraggernut is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 334
Default

I see you never got the account deleted like you begged for Ben Scammel.......so who really came here just looking for a fight?
Reply With Quote
  #333  
Old 03-30-2012, 07:20 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falstaff View Post
David Harward said:

>>How would you summarize what you have achieved in here? <<

Not much, but I have called you on your awful malicious manner, and that is good enough for me.

Congrats for that "accomplishment"!

Do you expect anyone is ever going to call you out for your awful malicious manner?
Reply With Quote
  #334  
Old 03-30-2012, 07:21 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chivas View Post
You may be older Falstaff, but I doubt it. If you are you certainly haven't learned much in all your years. Tell you what lets readdress this when you and sim are alittle older, to see if the sim has learned to crawl and you've matured.
Chivas, those in glass houses should not throw bricks. You have the grammar and spelling capability of a 14 year old boy. Common sence really.

And I am being sarcastic. But comments like this are spiteful, no? And serve no purpose to the debate at hand. Addman is right.

Whilst I find you one of the more level-headed posters, Falstaff is correct: you do act as though you have some inside knowledge none of us are aware about. Did you support Tree's posts pre-release? If so I would have to bow down to your current 'knowledge' and assume it's correct; but otherwise history shows that you've got no credible background to substantiate your allegations. I don't think any of us do really: just lucky (fluke-ish on some level; realistic on others) guesses.

CloD isn't a maturing baby. It's a late birth infected with a curable host of illnesses. And you are no doctor; nor are any of us. But at the end of the day, the illnesses are currently unshakeable.

And that may sound harsher than I intend it to be, because I do believe the game will mature into something great: be it through add-ons or community service.
__________________
Luthier: If not for your guys' criticism and incredibly high standards, we'd never have become what we are. Keep it up!

Source for the sceptical: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...11&postcount=9
Reply With Quote
  #335  
Old 03-30-2012, 07:22 PM
Falstaff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Actually taildragger, I did..check with the mods. I checked-in again on the off-chance that my IP cycle has ticked over, whcih it seems to have done. The only reason was to give back a taste to some posters what they have been dishing-out, which I dont like.

A ban is imminent (I hope) so you can carry on lionising such posters if you wish, and defend their right to attack people unopposed. I'm not pretending to be a white knight of righteousness, more just venting at some of the nastier idiots who seems to have this place in thrall.

Ben
Reply With Quote
  #336  
Old 03-30-2012, 07:24 PM
taildraggernut taildraggernut is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 334
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falstaff View Post
Actually taildragger, I did..check with the mods. I checked-in again on the off-chance that my IP cycle has ticked over, whcih it seems to have done. The only reason was to give back a taste to some posters what they have been dishing-out, which I dont like.

A ban is imminent (I hope) so you can carry on lionising such posters if you wish, and defend their right to attack people unopposed. I'm not pretending to be a white knight of righteousness, more just venting at some of the nastier idiots who seems to have this place in thrall.

Ben
2 wrongs don't make a right dear boy

p.s. @Philiped you spelled sense incorrectly

Last edited by taildraggernut; 03-30-2012 at 07:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #337  
Old 03-30-2012, 07:24 PM
Falstaff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

david Hayward said:

>>Do you expect anyone is ever going to call you out for your awful malicious manner? <<

No, because generally I do not have one. I am posting specifically because of your postsm, recently, and previously. And they deserve to be held up.

And your endless use of the interrogative (question) is dull as dishwater.
Reply With Quote
  #338  
Old 03-30-2012, 07:25 PM
Falstaff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

taildragger said:

>>2 wrongs don't make a right dear boy <<

No, they dont. But a little natural justice doesn't hurt occasionally, if it's kept in check, and if it's justified, as here.

Ben
Reply With Quote
  #339  
Old 03-30-2012, 07:26 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falstaff View Post
david Hayward said:

>>Do you expect anyone is ever going to call you out for your awful malicious manner? <<

No, because generally I do not have one.
All evidence in here to the contrary, I suppose.
Reply With Quote
  #340  
Old 03-30-2012, 07:28 PM
taildraggernut taildraggernut is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 334
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falstaff View Post
taildragger said:

>>2 wrongs don't make a right dear boy <<

No, they dont. But a little natural justice doesn't hurt occasionally, if it's kept in check, and if it's justified, as here.

Ben
But I thought you said you weren't pretending to be a 'white knight', now you proclaim yourself a champion of natural justice.....
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.