Luthier Update Clarification Please - Page 25

ACE-OF-ACES · #**241** 10-23-2011, 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM

Best post ever!

LOL!

You can always spot the guy who is upset and has absolutely nothing to back up his argument.

How you ask?

Easy!

Notice is he didn't quote let alone refute anything I actually said wrt Microsoft definition of what DX 11 API support means.

That is to say he didn't provide anything to the contrary (link, book reference, etc) to contradict what I said.

Why?

Well because he knows I am right!

And he also knows that any attempt his part to try and 'spin it' will only prove how empty his argument are and how wrong he is.

Which leaves him with only one way out.

Kill the messenger!

Because he knows he can not attack the message!

His goal (hope) being I will respond in kind and turn this into a flame feast to take the focus off the fact that he is wrong.

Typical troll tactics!

Which only goes to prove that there are two types of people in this world

1) People who are adult enough to admit they were wrong
2) People who are NOT adult enough to admit they were wrong

He being the latter

#**242** 10-23-2011, 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tvrdi

mesage is "Im sick help me!"

Someone is projecting.

Heliocon · #**243** 10-23-2011, 12:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RCAF_FB_Orville

Excellent question Krupi (which I have actually asked Ilya before and received no response). I'm rapidly losing faith in CoD ever representing a convincing or immersive representation of the BoB without extensive community intervention (IE Mission builders, modding etc).

It seems one of the most pivotal battles in History (fact) may just be a 1c 'test lab' now, reduced to the status of Guinea pig....which is a shame. Tossing this into the 'that'll do' bin would be a mistake on their part. Please prove me wrong. Surely all new developments/features in 'Battle for Moscow' will be applicable to CoD, too? Madness to think otherwise, but these days I sadly find myself second guessing everything they do.

Wont spend $1 on another one of their games unless COD is fixed to the highest level it can be through patches and we get the game we payed for. I am not willing to pay them for the game and hope the community fixes it, thats some bs.

LoBiSoMeM · #**244** 10-23-2011, 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heliocon

Wont spend $1 on another one of their games unless COD is fixed to the highest level it can be through patches and we get the game we payed for. I am not willing to pay them for the game and hope the community fixes it, thats some bs.

You guys missed the point...

We have a great air combat flight sim engine, with good content. We have a highly flexible FMB...

"Community fixes it"? YOU can do a lot of missions in FMB! YOU can do ASAP a lot of things with this sim engine!

I'm amazed how people still not seeing this... "Pay them for the game"... Yes, we payed and we received this great sim.

I fly modded IL-2 1946 almost in MP and modded arenas. CloD engine to me is a dream!

robtek · #**245** 10-23-2011, 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM

You guys missed the point...

We have a great air combat flight sim engine, with good content. We have a highly flexible FMB...

"Community fixes it"? YOU can do a lot of missions in FMB! YOU can do ASAP a lot of things with this sim engine!

I'm amazed how people still not seeing this... "Pay them for the game"... Yes, we payed and we received this great sim.

I fly modded IL-2 1946 almost in MP and modded arenas. CloD engine to me is a dream!

LoBiSoMeM,

with this pov i really don't understand why you don't side with AoA.

I fail to see, why you think you have to oppose him, is it personal?

It seems this slug-fest has only escalated about some really minor differences.

furbs · #**246** 10-23-2011, 08:21 AM

Yep, and nothing to do with the OP's question. Which as we all know will not get answered.

robtek · #**247** 10-23-2011, 08:24 AM

For those who don't want to read all pages, the original topic!

Quote:

Originally Posted by JG52Krupi

"We obviously remain hard at work on the series. We will continue to improve the game up until the eventual release of its sequel."

Above is an extract from your last update, as expected from such a sentence there is muttering in the ranks about what this actually means.

Could you give us an insight into the future of Cliffs of Dover and Battle for Moscow!

Will the sequel be a standalone, addon or will it be both?

pupo162 · #**248** 10-23-2011, 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robtek

For those who don't want to read all pages, the original topic!

well, im guessing that will be like forgotten battles, a stand alone, who incluedes all off cod + new expansion, not comaptible with COD.

robtek · #**249** 10-23-2011, 08:40 AM

If it includes all of CoD, how can it be incompatible with CoD???

Isn't every patch incompatible with previous versions?

SYN_Repent · #**250** 10-23-2011, 08:49 AM

if tree, or adonys, or one of the other so called "whiners" (good guys) had posted the original post, this thread would now be full of "stop whining and just play the new patch they released, let them get on with their work, it will be released when its ready, they will give us information when they can, they are too busy to answer right now"

krupi, stop f*cking whining and give luthier a break, dont over analyze what he says, your just looking for something to whine about.