|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Comedy of errors
Defiant with fairings lowered: Defiant with fairings raised:
__________________
My Il-2 CoD video web site: www.flightsimvids.com |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks for pointing this out Freycinet,I had'nt realised the fairings could be raised or lowered,you learn something everyday and I had'nt realised this before.
I just thought we had two distinctly different aircraft here,those fairings completely change the profile of the Defiant,top stuff mate I appreciate the reply to my thread.
__________________
Alienware Aurora|Win 7 64-bit Home Premium|IC i7-920 Processor (Quad-Core)|14GB DDR3 RAM|1 TB SATA 7200rpm Hard Drive|GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 770 2GB WINDFORCE 3 X fan|Thrustmaster Warthog|Saitek Pro Combat rudder pedals,throttle quadrant and Cessna trim wheel|TrackIR4|Sense of humour,I find it comes in handy! |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
what about the end of the fuselage right before the tail, all the photo's show a regular even decent towards the tail, the one in game just drops down lower before the tail. what is the reason for this?
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
I've noticed that too, but I think it's related with a specific angle of view.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
nah no chance its a definate change in shape rather than an optical effect.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Notice the fairings are in the up position. In the down position there would be a definite change in the slope. A better drawing, http://aircraftdrawingsdownload.com/files/defiant.pdf |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
No I'm talking about the rear of the fuselage by the tail it appears that it is a difference between a Defiant I and Defiant II, the II has the regular sloping fuselage.
Last edited by BigPickle; 07-15-2011 at 02:47 PM. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Yeah,the model we have in COD has both fairings in the lowered position,I understand this now,I do hope that they make the Defiant flyable,and that if they do,they incorporate the lowering and rising of the fairings within the controls.
I can't believe I thought that there were different models,I just assumed that there was two diffrent aircraft marks,lol. My sincere apologies to Luthier and team,how could I doubt you,you're aircraft are spot on.
__________________
Alienware Aurora|Win 7 64-bit Home Premium|IC i7-920 Processor (Quad-Core)|14GB DDR3 RAM|1 TB SATA 7200rpm Hard Drive|GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 770 2GB WINDFORCE 3 X fan|Thrustmaster Warthog|Saitek Pro Combat rudder pedals,throttle quadrant and Cessna trim wheel|TrackIR4|Sense of humour,I find it comes in handy! Last edited by Plt Off JRB Meaker; 07-16-2011 at 07:10 AM. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
They could perhaps implement the fairings as air-breaks: Up is off, down is on. One of the problems of the Daffy (and Skua) was that lowering the fairings for action would severely hit speed. Being slightly oldish, they would have problems keeping up with "modern" designs like the He 111 and Ju 88 as it was, lowering the fairings would really give them problems.
I really hope they make it flyable! |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
On further reading of my book'Boulton Paul Defiant by Mark Ansell,the fairings were incorporated,so that the air flow was'nt interupted through the rudder.
Apparantly they had major problems aerodynamically as soon as the turret was fitted.
__________________
Alienware Aurora|Win 7 64-bit Home Premium|IC i7-920 Processor (Quad-Core)|14GB DDR3 RAM|1 TB SATA 7200rpm Hard Drive|GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 770 2GB WINDFORCE 3 X fan|Thrustmaster Warthog|Saitek Pro Combat rudder pedals,throttle quadrant and Cessna trim wheel|TrackIR4|Sense of humour,I find it comes in handy! |
|
|