Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > King's Bounty

King's Bounty Famous series of Fantasy Real-time RPG with turn-based battles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-14-2011, 04:11 AM
babvieck babvieck is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 26
Default Difficulty of Legends vs AP

I bought them out of order and played Crossworlds first on normal. For a good chunk of the game, the difficulty seemed just right for me. On the border of being stuck but always able to find some army around my strength on some island, somewhere.
But eventually I developed a strategy that worked well for me and the last third or so of the game seemed fairly easy - taking on alledgedly very strong and lethal armies with little problem. Whether the game just clicked for me, or its judging of enemy army strength gets a bit out of line when you're both that powerful, I don't know.

Anyway, I started Legends on normal and the starting area is so easy as to be boring. But everything is listed as weak/very_weak. So I'm not sure if this is just because it has a gentler starting area than AP or if I should be playing on a higher difficulty because either it's easier, or I know what I'm doing this time. It seems feasible that AP would have been designed harder assuming you'd mostly know what you were doing from having played Legends I guess.

Any thoughts? Playing as a warrior btw.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-15-2011, 02:19 AM
Sir Whiskers Sir Whiskers is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 149
Default

Your experience matches mine. KB:TL starts out easy, gets more difficult in the middle (about the time I get to the dwarves), then easier later in the game. I will say that while I found a few fights at the end very tough, the final battle was surprisingly easy.

My biggest complaint about Legend is that it becomes a slog. The continents tend to be large, with large additional areas, such as undergrounds. If one plays to clear out everything, it can become tedious.

I'm thinking my next game I'll attempt to push forward as quickly as possible just to see how far I can get before the fights become impossible to beat (at which time I'll have to backtrack and pick up extra XP). My score will suffer, but I'm not much for tracking such things anyway.

KB:AP, in my opinion, is better balanced, but more importantly, rarely bogs down. Usually just as I'm getting bored of an area, it's clear and it's time to move on to another island. The quests also seem to have a bit more variety to them, though that may just be my imagination.

In my first game of AP, I agree that the play balance seemed just right, with the first few fights in a new area being a bit of a challenge, but by the time the area was cleared, I was ready for the next.

That said, later games have been much easier. Partly this is due to knowing what to expect. Partly it's just using better tactics. I can understand why experienced players like to challenge themselves by playing on Hard or Impossible. I've stayed with normal, but instead try to limit myself to certain units, such as only demons, or only humans. If nothing else, it forces me to adapt my tactics and makes the game a bit different.

All in all, these are my favorite games since HOMM 3, and just as addictive.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.