Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-08-2011, 10:24 PM
Buchon Buchon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 437
Default

Compare WOP and IL2COD is like compare Call of Duty and ArmA 2

At the end you're just only shaming yourself by not understand what they are.
  #2  
Old 05-08-2011, 11:16 PM
jt_medina jt_medina is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 212
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buchon View Post
Compare WOP and IL2COD is like compare Call of Duty and ArmA 2

At the end you're just only shaming yourself by not understand what they are.
People are comparing wop with il2cod because cod looks horribly worse compared to wop. Obviously We don't need a rocket scientist to know that COD is way more realistic but the truth is that COD is still unplayable for many and graphically speaking there is no apparent reason why IL2 COD should be so hardware demanding.

I play IL2COD almost maxed out (1920x1080)except buildings(med) and it doesn't graphically look so stunning to me, in fact I see it like the graphics were already obsolete. At least on the landscape thing.
  #3  
Old 05-09-2011, 02:04 AM
Buchon Buchon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 437
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jt_medina View Post
People are comparing wop with il2cod because cod looks horribly worse compared to wop. Obviously We don't need a rocket scientist to know that COD is way more realistic but the truth is that COD is still unplayable for many and graphically speaking there is no apparent reason why IL2 COD should be so hardware demanding.

I play IL2COD almost maxed out (1920x1080)except buildings(med) and it doesn't graphically look so stunning to me, in fact I see it like the graphics were already obsolete. At least on the landscape thing.
yeah ... Call of Duty looks better than ArmA 2 ...

I just had a smooth and awesome fly with my Spitfire I, have a look :



  #4  
Old 05-09-2011, 02:51 AM
jt_medina jt_medina is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 212
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buchon View Post
yeah ... Call of Duty looks better than ArmA 2 ...

I just had a smooth and awesome fly with my Spitfire I, have a look :



I can do that too. Set the right time of the day, add clouds and the right angle to make it look better, then I reduce the size of the image to make it look sharper.
I mostly play it midday time settings and doesn't look that nice, besides AA doesn't work at least with my GPU and jaggies are everywhere even at 1080 res.
  #5  
Old 05-09-2011, 03:04 AM
Buchon Buchon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 437
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jt_medina View Post
I can do that too. Set the right time of the day, add clouds and the right angle to make it look better, then I reduce the size of the image to make it look sharper.
I mostly play it midday time settings and doesn't look that nice, besides AA doesn't work at least with my GPU and jaggies are everywhere even at 1080 res.
Wow cool story bro

I dont did that, just enjoy with a Spitfire fly at sunset 18:00 PM

The screenshot is size down because Im playing at 1920x1200, so is to big to post it here, thats all
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.