The Bf109 is best in alt range of 0-5000

[ga_332]

Ok I study the manual and look slike the 109 v spit is faster, better climber, dives better in the alt range of 0-5000 m .

So in short if you are flying the 109 keep you self in the alt range from 0-5000 and you should have the uperhand against spit/Hurricane.

Do you guys agree?

[6S.Manu]

Originally Posted by ga_332

Ok I study the manual and look slike the 109 v spit is faster, better climber, dives better in the alt range of 0-5000 m .

So in short if you are flying the 109 keep you self in the alt range from 0-5000 and you should have the uperhand against spit/Hurricane.

Do you guys agree?

The FM are still bugged.. I would not expect realistic performances yet.

[lacusch69]

Originally Posted by ga_332

Ok I study the manual and look slike the 109 v spit is faster, better climber, dives better in the alt range of 0-5000 m .

So in short if you are flying the 109 keep you self in the alt range from 0-5000 and you should have the uperhand against spit/Hurricane.

Do you guys agree?

Absolut irreal OVER 5000...

Check this: http://www.pumaszallas.hu/il2cod/COD...charts_v01.jpg

And check this: http://kurfurst.org/Performance_test...109E_J347.html

Online: 109 is absolut loser versus british planes...

[VO101_Tom]

Originally Posted by lacusch69

And check this: http://www.pumaszallas.hu/il2cod/COD...charts_v01.jpg

I modified this file, copy (from cod manual) the Ju 87 too (It would be superb, if in the manual the graphs would be drawn in identical scale and a direction). Hah... Ju 87 can climb higher, than the 109? I have to try it, i can't believe it...

But... interest, that Hurricane have almost identical performance characteristics, than the most modern spitfire of BoB. I would be curious about a detailed graph, separate the variants of all aircrafts (like old Il-2 compare).

(Igen, megdumálhatnánk magyarul is, de ez nem csak Lacuschnak szól )

[Kwiatek]

For historical data look here in these topic:

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=20110

[ga_332]

Ok guys, History or not, my point is this that in the current state off the game in COD by the manuals for the game/COD the bf109 is better in all parts from 0-5000 m. v the spit/Hurricane, right.........Yes or no

[Lixma]

I've been able to climb away from both Hurricanes and Spitfires online. The Hurricane is obviously a bit easier to escape than the Spitfire. Against a determined Spitfire you need the patience of a saint and a whole channel's worth of distance to get yourself safe. But you can get away. Just don't expect to magically fly away from a Spit/Hurri from a similar energy state. The performance difference between aircraft is terrifyingly (and enjoyably) slender.

So, subjectively, i've found the 109 and Spit to be more or less equal in speed.

The 109 has a slight but usable advantage in climb rate.

Turn rate....109 shouldn't bother attempting it.

The Spit and Hurricane have better acceleration than the 109.

I repeat, these are just subjective, non scientific, tentative conclusions based on limited online scraps. Don't think i've ever gone much over 5k, either.