Building Pop Up

[philip.ed]

Without unkowingly becoming hypocritical too, you lot really are hypocritical.
At the end of the day, all Tree has done is ask a question and the lot of you have trolled his topic. Whinging that Tree has whinged makes you what? Whingers? nah, surely not...

you may lack the intellect, but is it really so hard to ignore Tree's topics and let Oleg or Luthier answer if necessary?
Because topics like these just turn into a session where (grown?) men are talking about Tree...
not sure about you lot, but it's like a perverse form of a Tree fan-club.

At the end of the day, if any other user had posed this question, it would probably have resulted in '+1's' or people saying that it would nice to see fade implemented, but obviously it's not a priority to include quickly pre-release.

[JG52Uther]

Originally Posted by philip.ed

Without unkowingly becoming hypocritical too, you lot really are hypocritical.
At the end of the day, all Tree has done is ask a question and the lot of you have trolled his topic. Whinging that Tree has whinged makes you what? Whingers? nah, surely not...

you may lack the intellect, but is it really so hard to ignore Tree's topics and let Oleg or Luthier answer if necessary?
Because topics like these just turn into a session where (grown?) men are talking about Tree...
not sure about you lot, but it's like a perverse form of a Tree fan-club.

At the end of the day, if any other user had posed this question, it would probably have resulted in '+1's' or people saying that it would nice to see fade implemented, but obviously it's not a priority to include quickly pre-release.

+1
More than a bit of Tree envy going on here methinks,my gaydar is off the scale!

[hashi]

Again, no issue at all with someone having questions about building popus etc.
it is only right and proper that questions get asked.

But the questions that were asked in this instance were not designed to get an informative answer...they were designed to inflame or iritate. Read the actual question again...the response requested was a yes/no to presupposed answers, both of which have seriously negative connotations.

If the question had been "are there still going to be building popups like in IL2?", yes, +1's all round. but if it is along the same lines as "do you take medication for your mental illness, or do you handle it some other way?"...THAT is entirely inappropriate and offensive...it is MEANT to be!

[nearmiss]

Don't sweat Tree he has a penchant for worry that mirrors that of a woman, even though I suspect he is a man.

Originally Posted by nearmiss

I don't care if they popup, just as long as I'm far enough away not to see it.

There is always that.

Don't sweat Tree he has a penchant for worry that mirrors that of a woman, even though I suspect he is a man.

you suspect correctly

[Kikuchiyo]

Pop up is a legitimate issue, but I suspect that it will be something that will always exsist (or at least until computers are capable of rendering all things at all times simultaneously). the power of your PC will determine how noticeable the pop up will be.

[Feuerfalke]

Originally Posted by philip.ed

Without unkowingly becoming hypocritical too, you lot really are hypocritical.
At the end of the day, all Tree has done is ask a question and the lot of you have trolled his topic. Whinging that Tree has whinged makes you what? Whingers? nah, surely not...

you may lack the intellect, but is it really so hard to ignore Tree's topics and let Oleg or Luthier answer if necessary?
Because topics like these just turn into a session where (grown?) men are talking about Tree...
not sure about you lot, but it's like a perverse form of a Tree fan-club.

At the end of the day, if any other user had posed this question, it would probably have resulted in '+1's' or people saying that it would nice to see fade implemented, but obviously it's not a priority to include quickly pre-release.

I absolutely agree on the part of Tree's question.

However:

...or is the Cliffs Of Dover game engine already showing its age?

... is not an neutral question. And it's not hypocritical. It's just a fully unjustified implication based on a personal opinion, neatly posted in a side-sentence to give the provocation an extra-weight. Sure, his goal was a reaction. And this is exactly what he got.

I bet once Tree learns to post questions instead of provocative statements, Oleg or Luthier would even start answering his requests.

But until that: What goes around comes around. Especially if you literally ask for it.

[kendo65]

Originally Posted by Feuerfalke

I absolutely agree on the part of Tree's question.

However:

... is not an neutral question. And it's not hypocritical. It's just a fully unjustified implication based on a personal opinion, neatly posted in a side-sentence to give the provocation an extra-weight. Sure, his goal was a reaction. And this is exactly what he got.

I bet once Tree learns to post questions instead of provocative statements, Oleg or Luthier would even start answering his requests.

But until that: What goes around comes around. Especially if you literally ask for it.

I have to agree with what Feuerfalke says. Tree's question is totally justified and understandable.

It's the deliberate barbed comment at the end that has no purpose other than trying to get a reaction out of people.

[rakinroll]

Keep going Tree, hope you can have an answer from developers.